Harry Styles' Vogue cover left fans breathless. Now conservatives are fired up too
- Oops!Something went wrong.Please try again later.
Conservative pundits Candace Owens and Ben Shapiro are under fire after shaming pop star Harry Styles for wearing a dress on the cover of Vogue.
Thousands, including Trixie Mattel, Olivia Wilde, Bob the Drag Queen and Jameela Jamil, have slammed Owens' and Shapiro's controversial comments on the December issue of Vogue, which features Styles wearing a ruffled, lacy, floor-length Gucci gown and navy tuxedo jacket, among other stylish looks.
On Friday, the "Watermelon Sugar" hitmaker made history as the first man to appear solo on the cover of the fashion magazine.
"There is no society that can survive without strong men," Owens tweeted Saturday in response to Styles' groundbreaking photo shoot.
"The East knows this. In the west, the steady feminization of our men at the same time that Marxism is being taught to our children is not a coincidence," she added. "It is an outright attack. Bring back manly men."
Quick to agree with Owens was her right-wing peer Shapiro, who argued on Monday, "Anyone who pretends that it is not a referendum on masculinity for men to don floofy dresses is treating you as a full-on idiot."
This is perfectly obvious. Anyone who pretends that it is not a referendum on masculinity for men to don floofy dresses is treating you as a full-on idiot. https://t.co/cioUNBh4bi
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) November 16, 2020
The backlash to their remarks was swift and sharp from many who believe people have a right to dress however they choose and pointed out that clothing does not have a gender.
"You're ignoring the fact that no society can survive without fem men, or masc women, or fem women, or people in between all of that," tweeted "RuPaul's Drag Race" champion Bob the Drag Queen.
"It's almost like no society is a monolith and that's how societies thrive ... through multiple contributions from various demographics."
You're ignoring the fact that no society can survive without fem men, or masc women, or fem women, or people in between all of that. It's almost like no society is a monolith and that's how societies thrive. . . through multiple contributions from various demographics. https://t.co/vbcu0lUrmb
— Black Lives Still Matter (@thatonequeen) November 16, 2020
Another "RuPaul's Drag Race" winner, Mattel, warned Owens of "a big storm comin'," while "Legendary" judge Jamil dubbed Styles' haters "insecure, toxic, woman-hating, homophobic d—heads." Director Wilde, who recently cast the former One Direction heartthrob in her highly anticipated sophomore film, simply called Owens "pathetic."
"Harry Styles is plenty manly, because manly is whatever you want it to be," Jamil tweeted. "He's 104% perfect."
"Also ... this was at one time considered very manly," she added, along with a photo of "The Favourite" actor Nicholas Hoult dressed in a period costume. "Wigs, make up, tights, frills ... maybe this is the comeback of the 'manly man.'"
In a viral Instagram post, writer and performance artist Alok Vaid-Menon weighed in on Styles' Vogue spread — which also included vibrant overcoats, a Victoriana crinoline skirt with hot pink accents, a matching kilt and blazer, and Styles’ signature high-waisted flare pants — "while also remembering that it could only happen because of the resistance of trans femmes of color."
"Am I happy to see Harry be celebrated for openly flouting gendered fashion norms? Yes," Vaid-Menon wrote. "Do trans femmes of color receive praise for doing the same thing every day? No.
"Do I think this is a sign of progress of society’s evolution away from binary gender? Yes," they added. "Do I think that white men should be upheld as the face of gender neutral fashion? No. ... Make no mistake: trans femmes of color started this and continue to face the backlash from it. ... Is that Harry’s fault? No. It’s the fault of systems of transmisogyny and racism."
In conversation with Vogue's Hamish Bowles, Styles credited rock legends Prince, Elton John and David Bowie with inspiring him to embrace all kinds of fashion, adding, "When you take away ‘There’s clothes for men and there’s clothes for women,’ once you remove any barriers, obviously you open up the arena in which you can play.”
"I’ll go in shops sometimes, and I just find myself looking at the women’s clothes thinking they’re amazing,” the “Fine Line” artist said.
“Any time you’re putting barriers up in your own life, you’re just limiting yourself. There’s so much joy to be had in playing with clothes. I’ve never really thought too much about what it means — it just becomes this extended part of creating something.”
See more reactions to Styles' inspiring cover shoot below.
We don't know who needs to hear this but Harry Styles looks amazing in a dress.
— Twitter Music (@TwitterMusic) November 16, 2020
The reason you feel the need to protect masculinity is because know EXACTLY how fragile it is. https://t.co/nrw6VbXINT
— Black Lives Still Matter (@thatonequeen) November 16, 2020
Preach it, Candace! #BringBackManlyMen https://t.co/NIZJhMb217 pic.twitter.com/mY6AJH89Sq
— Misha Collins (@mishacollins) November 16, 2020
If Harry Styles wearing a dress threatens your manhood, you were never really a man to begin with.
— Ari Solomon (@VeganAri) November 16, 2020
harry styles waking up everyday knowing he can rock a dress better than candace owens pic.twitter.com/oQR7TclFsX
— caleb (@STARB0Y5SOS) November 16, 2020
harry styles wearing dresses and looking as beautiful as ever pic.twitter.com/IED2ucmTCc
— lyds ❀ (@INFINITEZOUlS) November 16, 2020
Harry Styles can wear whatever TF he wants.
— LaToya Morgan (@MorganicInk) November 16, 2020
Love love love this @Harry_Styles @voguemagazine spread. I remember when some said I played into “heteronormativity” by wearing chinos in @TIME. Honestly, what can you wear these days? Oh yeah. That’s right. Anything you damn well please.
— Chasten Buttigieg (@Chasten) November 16, 2020
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.