Harvard ditched US values of due process and diverse opinion in Harvey Weinstein case

I’m glad Harvard students are anti-rape, but Weinstein must be defended all the same. Lawyers like Ronald Sullivan uphold a bedrock American right.

When I’m on the side of defending Harvey Weinstein, we are on all new ground.

Yet I am, in the sense that I don’t think Harvard should have fired a faculty dean for providing legal counsel to this loathsome person.

Law professor Ronald Sullivan has lost his position at Winthrop House, where undergrads didn’t want to live and eat with, much less be mentored by, someone representing a world-class predator in court. (On Monday, Sullivan announced that he’s leaving Weinstein’s defense team anyway, because the upcoming trial would conflict with his class schedule — but he's still available for advice and consultation.)

Yes, Sullivan's former client has been credibly accused of serious crimes against generations of Hollywood actresses. The damage this one man has inflicted must make him a role model for psychopaths the world over.

But in our country, serial killers and terrorists and rapists, too, are entitled to the kind of defense that in theory separates us from, say, the Philippines, where dictator Rodrigo Duterte has drug dealers murdered. Or from Saudi Arabia, where criticism is answered with assassination. In Hungary, you can be fired for dissenting views; in American academia, that’s not supposed to happen.

Harvard law professor Ronald Sullivan, a Harvey Weinstein adviser who previously represented him, at the New York Supreme Court in New York on Jan. 25, 2019.
Harvard law professor Ronald Sullivan, a Harvey Weinstein adviser who previously represented him, at the New York Supreme Court in New York on Jan. 25, 2019.

Read more commentary:

Noncompete clauses trap #MeToo victims in abusive jobs. The FTC should ban them.

Military sexual assaults spiked in 2018, and that means leaders are still failing to lead

Don't judge Kavanaugh accusers. I covered the police and didn't report my own rape.

When today’s Harvard students get their turn to run the world, will they know that? I’m glad they’re so anti-rape that they don’t feel like taking life lessons from someone who thinks that behavior is defensible.

Weinstein deserves a fair trial

Even so, Weinstein must be defended all the same. And even the argument that doing so disqualifies Sullivan as a guide to students is wrong. For one thing, only a fair trial and vigorous defense will make possible the long incarceration I’m hoping for. Beyond this, what could be more fundamental to American values than those rights?

Danukshi A.K. Mudannayake, a student leading the campaign against Sullivan, started a petition that called his work for the movie producer “deeply trauma-inducing" and questioned whether the professor really does "value the safety of the students he lives with in Winthrop House."

Sullivan no more supports rape by representing Weinstein than Leslie Abramson, mother of two, supported patricide by representing the Menendez brothers. He’s the same person as when he represented Michael Brown's relatives in their lawsuit against Ferguson, Missouri. And as when he has gotten thousands of wrongfully incarcerated people set free.

Even in our most glancing interactions, online and in real life, we shun and self-segregate and want to be protected from those who are in our view in the wrong. Not only on existential issues, either.

Harvard should value diversity and due process

Recently, I went to a party with my mother in Indiana. Are you the Republican daughter? a friend of hers asked me. Are you the one we like? I guess that would be a no and a no, ma’am. Others asked me why CNN commentators are allowed to lie, why newspapers are all so terrible these days, and whether crazy people should really have a forum for crazy ideas like the "Green New Deal." From Evansville to Cambridge, absolutists are free of self-doubt.

But Harvard leaders, you don’t have the luxury of some ladies in Derby Day hats inside the Fox News bubble. You have a responsibility to diversity of thought, and to reinforcing the importance of due process. Even for Harvey Weinstein. Even when students are sitting in, calling out and very, very unhappy.

I keep reading that Sullivan and his wife, law school lecturer Stephanie Robinson, who were Harvard’s first African-American faculty deans, are not really out because of Weinstein, but because of complaints that go back several years. If that’s true, then the lesson is that grudges well nursed will pay off eventually.

As in an uproar as Winthrop House has been, Harvard, you were wrong to give the right-minded a reason to celebrate this week. Because we’re not Hungary, are we? And because the impulse to insulate needs no encouragement.

Melinda Henneberger, a columnist and editorial writer for The Kansas City Star, is a member of USA TODAY's Board of Contributors. Follow her on Twitter: @MelindaKCMO

You can read diverse opinions from our Board of Contributors and other writers on the Opinion front page, on Twitter @usatodayopinion and in our daily Opinion newsletter. To respond to a column, submit a comment to letters@usatoday.com.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Harvard ditched US values of due process and diverse opinion in Harvey Weinstein case