Health officer's lawyer: Ottawa Impact trying to 'rewrite history' by undoing vote

OTTAWA COUNTY — The battle between Ottawa County’s "interim" health officer and a group of ultra-conservative county commissioners determined to remove her is intensifying after the officials indicated their intention to "correct" the December action that appointed her to the role.

On Friday, Feb. 24, the agenda was publicly posted for this week's Ottawa County Board of Commissioners meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening, Feb. 28.

The only "action" item on the agenda for Tuesday is to "correct a resolution" from the Dec. 13 meeting that effectively appointed Adeline Hambley as the county's new health officer after outgoing officer Lisa Stefanovsky announced in August that she planned to retire in spring.

More:Ottawa County board picks internal candidate as new health officer

More:Ottawa County Health Officer Lisa Stefanovsky announces retirement just weeks after fateful primary

The move comes after Hambley sued seven commissioners who belong to the far-right group Ottawa Impact on Feb. 10, claiming they repeatedly have interfered with her ability to do her job and have overreached their authority by attempting to limit her state-authorized health duties.

From dictating to her that Ottawa County will not issue any health orders that "overstep parental rights" to erroneously claiming the county's health department sponsored Grand Valley State University’s recent Sex Ed Week to claims of "promoting radicalized sexual content" to refusing to approve federal grant-funded mental health positions, the OI commissioners have been laser focused on the health department since taking office at the beginning to the year.

Adeline Hambley
Adeline Hambley

Most recently, Hambley, on Feb. 21, appeared before the board urging them to approve an agreement for the Community Health Needs Assessment, a collaborative effort by the health department, local hospitals and several other entities to identify and define local health issues, concerns and needs. It's a statutory requirement for nonprofit hospitals and helps the health department identify and address needs.

The memorandum of understanding, outlining commitments by various organizations, was approved in a committee meeting — but held up on full board approval by Vice Chair Sylvia Rhodea, a co-founder of Ottawa Impact, who said she wanted to review the questions used in the survey.

Hambley told the commissioners the survey isn’t theirs to approve.

More:Health officer chastises Ottawa County board for failing to approve health assessment

More:Lawsuit: Health officer says Ottawa Impact commissioners targeted her

“The Healthy Ottawa Coalition determines the questions based on the acceptable methods and prescribed standards,” she said. “It's not a purview of this board to review or approve the survey questions, just as it’s not under your purview to dictate water sampling methods, how to complete dental cleaning or how to complete cause of death investigations.”

Hambley said questions relating to sexual orientation and gender identity, which she believed to be sources of concern for commissioners, are necessary for hospitals to understand healthcare needs and health disparities for those populations.

“Providers who are informed are better able to provide care that is relevant, specific and compassionate,” Hambley said. “It's data that our hospital partners need.”

Hambley said the survey is voluntary and for adults, and that the process will move forward “with or without” the county.

“It's a requirement for hospitals that this process continues to move forward, and it will do so with or without us at the table,” she said. “However, we will be in breach of contract that I believe will do damage to the credibility of Ottawa County moving forward by failing to pass and continuing this on. That needs to be approved and done.”

Three days later, the board indicated it intended to change the vote in December — when none of the OI commissioners held office yet — to force a second board-wide vote to approve Hambley's appointment.

"Whereas, after a review of the video record of the meeting and of the official meeting minutes, it is clear that the written resolution does not accurately reflect the motion and vote that took place on the Resolution, nor does it accurately reflect the official board minutes," the resolution planned for Tuesday evening read.

What's at issue

A written resolution for Hambley's appointment was prepared ahead of the board's Dec. 13 meeting. When former Commissioner Phil Kuyers made the verbal motion to bring the issue to a vote, he verbalized that the move was "contingent upon approval by the board of commissioners," in addition to being approved by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and that she pass educational requirements and a background check.

The new commissioners now claim the written resolution from Dec. 13 "did not accurately reflect the motion and vote that took place, because it improperly omitted the first contingency that Adeline Hambley will only be appointed as Ottawa County Administrative Health Officer 'contingent upon 1) approval by the Boardof Commissioners.'"

Sarah Riley Howard, who is representing Hambley in her lawsuit, warned county corporate counsel Jack Jordan in an email sent Tuesday morning that such a move would violate the state's Open Meetings Act.

Sarah Riley Howard
Sarah Riley Howard

"The action request ... claims that the resolution that the prior Board passed 'did not accurately reflect the motion and vote that actually took place.' That is false," Howard wrote. "The prior Board voted to, and did, appoint Ms. Hambley contingent upon standard approvals which occurred, rendering the appointment automatically effective. The prior Board did not intend to require a second vote of appointment after the occurrence of the contingencies, which is clear from the record.

"In any event, the original resolution that the prior Board voted to pass controls. Plus, under the Open Meetings Act, the time has passed for any allegedly appropriate corrections to the minutes or other official record, including the text of written resolutions."

According to the Michigan Open Meetings Act, (15.269 Minutes: Sec. 9. (1)): ... The public body shall make any corrections in the minutes at the next meeting after the meeting to which the minutes refer. The public body shall make corrected minutes available at or before the next subsequent meeting after correction.

The new board approved the minutes of the former board's Dec. 13 meeting at its Jan. 10 meeting.

"If the current Board approves the proposed motion and the revisionist resolution tonight, that will not be a lawful method to change the action that the prior Board effectuated," Howard wrote to Jordan. "It will instead be an attempt to rewrite history, be an act of unlawful retaliation against my client for filing her lawsuit in circuit court seeking to settle her employment status and her authority under state law, and constitute a violation of OMA."

It was unknown as of publication time if the board planned to remove the planned action from Tuesday night's meeting. See Thursday's print edition of The Sentinel or visit HollandSentinel.com for coverage of the evening meeting.

How we got here

Hambley sued seven of the board's eight Ottawa Impact-backed county commissioners, claiming they are preventing her from doing her job and “constructively terminated” her by voting to demote her during the board’s inaugural meeting.

After being sworn in Jan. 3, the new OI commissioners made several sweeping changes, including:

  • Firing county administrator John Shay and replacing him with former GOP congressional candidate John Gibbs without conducting a public interview.

  • Eliminating the county’s Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Office.

  • Choosing a new health officer to replace Adeline Hambley, the appointed successor to outgoing officer Lisa Stefanovsky, naming her "interim" health officer, instead.

  • Firing county corporate counsel Doug Van Essen, and hiring Lansing-based Kallman Legal Group.

  • Changing the county’s motto from “Where You Belong” to “Where Freedom Rings."

Hambley filed her lawsuit Feb. 10 in Ottawa County’s 20th Circuit Court, naming seven of the eight Ottawa Impact commissioners as defendants: Board Chair Joe Moss, Rhodea, and Commissioners Lucy Ebel, Gretchen Cosby, Roger Belknap, Allison Miedema and Rebekah Curran.

The remaining Ottawa Impact commissioner, Jacob Bonnema, wasn't present at the Jan. 3 meeting and is not named as a defendant.

The question over who ultimately has the authority to control public health orders has been challenged in Ottawa County multiple times since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. In October 2020, the Ottawa County Department of Public Health issued numerous warnings to Hudsonville-based private Christian school Libertas over its failure to comply with the state’s health orders.

More:County attorney pleaded with Ottawa Impact not to fire Shay. 'You will send shock waves.'

More:Court of Appeals upholds Ottawa County health officer's right to issue mask mandate

The school, where Moss’ children attend, was briefly closed by the county, which prompted an unsuccessful lawsuit from parents.

A second lawsuit, filed by Moss and other parents in September 2021, claimed Stefanovsky overstepped her authority and should have sought approval from the county board before issuing a countywide mask order for pre-K-6 students. That suit was also unsuccessful, and the district court’s findings were upheld on appeal.

Commissioner Joe Moss listens as members of the public address the boar during the first public comment session Thursday, Feb. 16, 2023, at the Ottawa County Offices in West Olive.
Commissioner Joe Moss listens as members of the public address the boar during the first public comment session Thursday, Feb. 16, 2023, at the Ottawa County Offices in West Olive.

By April 2022, Moss had announced his bid for county commissioner, forming Ottawa Impact and recruiting others to join him. The group made no secret on the campaign trail that it intended to prevent any future mask mandates and that OCDPH would face intense scrutiny over the distribution of sexual health materials and related information.

Eight of nine OI candidates defeated the board’s Republican incumbents in the August primary, and now sit on the board.

More:Christian nationalism is gripping the nation — has it arrived in Ottawa County?

More:Ottawa County's prospective health officer has no experience. Here's why that could be a problem

After the commissioners were sworn into office, Miedema made a motion to demote Hambley to "interim" health officer, "in favor of the hiring of Nathaniel Kelly as Health Officer,” the lawsuit states.

“Upon information and belief, this motion was part of an overall political strategy the Individual Defendant Commissioners orchestrated prior to taking office. The motion to demote Plaintiff was not on the public agenda posted prior to the meeting. The Individual Defendant Commissioners voted to approve the motion.”

The actions taken Jan. 3 were added to the agenda after incoming commissioners changed the rules to make it easier to add items without prior notice.

Attorney General Dana Nessel’s Office announced Jan. 4 it was reviewing the board’s first meeting for numerous potential violations of the state's Open Meetings Act. On Feb. 16, Nessel said, despite the conduct of the Ottawa Impact commissioners being a “blatant violation of the public’s trust and the tenets of government transparency,” it didn't technically violate state law.

More:AG: Ottawa Impact violated spirit of OMA, stronger transparency laws needed

Hambley says the demotion to “interim” health officer was “a constructive termination,” and that an actual termination is looming.

“By their public statements, Defendants have made clear that Plaintiff’s actual termination as the Health Officer, and possible complete termination from her county employment, is imminent,” the lawsuit says.

Replacing Hambley with Kelly would achieve the OI commissioners’ goal of having a health officer who aligns with their beliefs and values.

Nathaniel Kelly
Nathaniel Kelly

“Defendants’ reasons for demoting Plaintiff and announcing the hiring of Mr. Kelly … were philosophical and political, because Defendants oppose the exercise of many of the Health Officer’s statutory powers under state law to initiate orders and other actions for protection of the public health,” the lawsuit states.

Kelly has been vocal about his anti-mask and anti-vaccine stances. Kelly, the health and safety manager at a Grand Rapids-area HVAC company, has no previous work history in public health and said he would recommend kits for individuals infected by COVID-19 with vitamins, ivermectin and neti pots, but not masking or social distancing.

“No social distancing would be suggested since it has no basis in any proven science,” Kelly said during an event in 2022. “No mass testing for asymptomatic individuals; asymptomatic individuals do not transmit disease.”

Kelly, a self-described “autodidact,” has defended his credentials, arguing his experience with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration during his military career inspired him to continue his education through the online for-profit college Columbia Southern University. Kelly has two degrees from the college, including a master of public health in 2020 and a master in occupational health in 2018.

Hambley has worked in OCDPH for nearly 19 years, serving as environmental health manager since 2011. In that role, she oversaw the food inspection program, sustainability centers and well and septic programs. She holds a bachelor's degree in biology and a master's in business administration, both from Grand Valley State University.

Subscribe: Get all your breaking news and unlimited access to our local coverage

In her lawsuit, Hambley says the OI commissioners failed to follow county hiring procedures and still haven’t submitted Kelly’s credentials to the state for approval, which is required under state law. As of Monday, Feb. 27, the MDHHS said it still has not received any information regarding the appointment of Kelly.

“Defendants never posted the position of Health Officer after they assumed office … nor did they observe any standard and customary county hiring practices, like taking applications or holding interviews with candidates … that were open to the public,” the lawsuit says.

“Instead, the Individual Defendant Commissioners selected Mr. Kelly as their favored choice for the Health Officer in secret meetings not open to the public, and without any public process for vetting him as a candidate.”

OI Commissioner Cosby, who previously worked as a registered nurse, admitted Jan. 31 that she vetted Kelly's resume through Ottawa Impact prior to being sworn in as a commissioner — and that she couldn't recall reviewing any other applications.

The lawsuit claims Ottawa Impact is attempting to justify demoting Hambley, so it can install Kelly and possibly have Hambley continue to perform most of the health officer duties in a demoted capacity.

“If Defendants continue to employ Plaintiff, it will be in a demoted, mostly ministerial and clerical, position so that the Ottawa County Health Department falsely appears to function with Mr. Kelly at the helm with some semblance of competence and statutory compliance, even though Mr. Kelly lacks relevant and necessary professional experience to perform the Health Officer role,” the lawsuit states.

Hambley says the OI defendants are attempting to “manufacture alleged cause to criticize Plaintiff’s performance of her duties and/or to manufacture political controversy.”

The lawsuit came on the heels of allegations from Moss the OCDPH appeared to “sponsor” Grand Valley State University’s Sex Ed Week, which concluded Friday, Feb. 10.

More: Sex Ed Week at GVSU has Ottawa Impact digging into county's health department

More:Amid in-fighting, censures: What is the future for Ottawa County conservatism?

After an anonymous blog post accused OCDPH of sponsoring what it characterized as a “raunchy” event, Moss went on far-right West Michigan radio personality Justin Barclay’s Feb. 9 broadcast, saying “there needs to be accountability where it needs to be, and critical thought when making decisions on what kind of events people decide to participate in or sponsor and support."

The publicity the allegations drew resulted in local media inquiries to OCDPH, which responded through its communications officer, Alison Clark, who said OCDPH was not a sponsor of the event, and coincidentally was conducting its monthly sexually transmitted infections clinic at GVSU in Allendale, a practice that's been ongoing for three years.

The health department requested GVSU remove the department’s logo from its website “because it gave the appearance that the department is a sponsor of this event, and it is not. OCDPH did not contribute any funding for this event," Clark said in the statement.

“A conservative internet blog and Defendant Moss made public statements inferring that the student event was an example of something unseemly that the Health Department was sponsoring,” Hambley’s lawsuit stated. “As is a common part of the Health Officer’s duties, Plaintiff clarified when asked by local news media that the Health Department was not sponsoring the event.”

After providing the statement to MLive, Clark asked her words be retracted. When asked why, she told MLive it was at the request of Ottawa County Administrator John Gibbs.

Hambley says in her lawsuit that Gibbs emailed and ordered her to have the statement retracted because he didn't approve of its release.

On Feb. 10, “Mr. Gibbs spoke to Plaintiff and was very upset, reprimanded her for not obtaining prior approval from him to release a statement, said the statement was not truthful, and that there ‘would be consequences,’” the lawsuit states. “Plaintiff respectfully advised Mr. Gibbs that she disagreed with retracting the statement and stated why she believed her statement was true and appropriate.”

More: Did the majority of Ottawa County support Ottawa Impact at the polls? The data says no

More: Residents angered over Ottawa Impact policies form coalition to vote them out in 2024

Hambley said Gibbs then accused an OCDPH employee of being involved with the GVSU event and wanted an investigation conducted.

“When Plaintiff responded that she believed that the employee that Mr. Gibbs was accusing participated (if at all) on her own personal time, Mr. Gibbs’ response was: ‘I don’t give a f*** if it was done in a personal capacity or not.’ Plaintiff believes that Mr. Gibbs’ insistence on an ‘investigation’ could be an attempt to fire this employee for potentially volunteering for the event on his/her personal time.”

Hambley said the GVSU incident is the latest example of being asked by Gibbs and the OI commissioners to “name names” in an attempt to “micromanage Plaintiff in the performance of the Health Officer duties, even though state law provides the Health Officer with duties and powers specifically free of this type of interference for particular policy reasons.”

The lawsuit seeks declaratory, injunctive and punitive relief.

Hambley is asking the court to declare her the health officer for Ottawa County, without any “interim” designation or demotion, and to find that the commissioners may not appoint Kelly. She also is seeking monetary damages for lost wages and mental anguish.

Hambley also wants the judge to affirm the commissioners may not remove her from the position, unless:

  • They have “just cause,” or can prove misconduct

  • They provide notice of all allegations constituting any such misconduct

  • They provide the opportunity for a public hearing

Doug Van Essen
Doug Van Essen

Both former corporate counsel Van Essen, in 2020, and former state attorney general Mike Cox, in a parallel legal opinion in 2021, said the board could only remove the health officer if she was “incompetent to execute properly the duties of the office” or if she was “guilty of official misconduct or habitual or willful neglect of duty,” but said the board could only pursue the latter two reasons after a hearing in which the health officer and her legal counsel could be heard.

“Plaintiff reasonably fears that she will be unable to carry out the duties required of the Health Officer under state law, even in an 'Interim' designation, and that this state of affairs is a danger to the public health,” the lawsuit states. “In the event of a public health crisis requiring swift action, it is unlikely that Plaintiff would be able to obtain a legal remedy from this Court in time to respond and exercise her duties under Michigan law.”

— Sarah Leach is executive editor of The Holland Sentinel. Contact her at sarah.leach@hollandsentinel.com. Follow her on Twitter @SentinelLeach.

This article originally appeared on The Holland Sentinel: Health officer's lawyer: OI trying to 'rewrite history' by undoing vote