Home Office overspends on ‘poor value’ hotels for refugees, says report

An upsurge in Channel crossings has contributed to a rise in costs associated with refugees - Gareth Fuller/PA
An upsurge in Channel crossings has contributed to a rise in costs associated with refugees - Gareth Fuller/PA

A third of Britain’s international aid budget is being spent on supporting refugees and asylum seekers in the UK – and much of it is being wasted, an official watchdog has warned.

The Independent Commission for Aid Impact (ICAI) said its investigators had heard evidence that girls and young women who had fled to the UK had faced harassment in hotels.

And it warned that the £3.5 billion of aid money spent on refugees – many of them from Ukraine and Afghanistan, but also those who have come to the UK in small boats – was “poor value for money”.

The ICAI concluded that the Home Office did not monitor spending properly, meaning Britain spent over the odds on hotels.

Costs have ballooned

It also warned that while so-called “in-donor refugee costs” have ballooned in recent years, the UK’s response to floods in Pakistan and drought in Somalia has been delayed and “very limited”.

The findings will add to the pressure on the Government to tackle the issue of migrant small boats crossing the Channel and bear down on the backlog in asylum claims.

Under international aid rules, the first-year costs of supporting refugees in a donor country can qualify as official development assistance.

The ICAI said while the rule has always been considered controversial, it has become particularly “problematic” in recent years, partially as a result of the large-scale visa schemes for refugees from Ukraine and Afghanistan, as well as an upsurge in Channel crossings.

As a result, it estimates that core expenditure on in-donor refugee costs was around £3.5 billion in 2022, accounting for around a third of the UK’s total aid spend that year.

The ICAI says the UK’s ability to respond to humanitarian emergencies such as the recent extreme flooding in Pakistan has been ‘sharply curtailed’ - Rizwan Tabassum/AFP
The ICAI says the UK’s ability to respond to humanitarian emergencies such as the recent extreme flooding in Pakistan has been ‘sharply curtailed’ - Rizwan Tabassum/AFP

With the overseas aid budget limited to 0.5 per cent of GDP, the ICAI said the UK’s ability to respond to international humanitarian emergencies has been “sharply curtailed” as the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) has been forced to pause “non-essential” spending.

“This was seen in the limited UK response both to devastating floods in Pakistan in August 2022, and to the worsening drought in the Horn of Africa, which is expected to lead to widespread famine in 2023,” said the ICAI.

It added the shift in resources away from emergency response to supporting refugees in the UK represented a “significant loss” in the efficiency of aid spending.

There was no incentive for the Home Office to control its spending on in-donor refugee costs as they come from the FCDO budget.

Hotel numbers double in six months

Between October 2022 and March this year, the number of hotels used by the Home Office to house asylum seekers and refugees almost doubled from around 200 to 386.

The ICAI said it had heard “a lot of anecdotal” evidence of safeguarding lapses in asylum hotels, particularly for women and girls, who face significant risks of harassment and gender-based violence.

Sarah Champion, chairwoman of the Commons international development committee, called on the FCDO to defend the aid budget from “profligate” Home Office spending.

“This review confirms that our valuable aid budget is being squandered as a result of Home Office failure to get on top of asylum application backlogs and keep control of the costs of asylum accommodation and support contracts,” she said.

“It is time for the UK Government to get a grip on Home Office spending of the aid budget so that we can return to the real spirit of aid spending – spending that should promote and target the economic development and welfare of developing countries.”