Letters to the Editor: Will a tax on gun dealers and manufacturers save lives in California?

A customer examines a Valor Industries LLC California-compliant AR-15 style rifle displayed for sale at a vendor booth at the Crossroads of the West Gun Show at the Orange County Fairgrounds on June 5, 2021 in Costa Mesa, California. - Gun sales increased in the US following Covid-19 pandemic lockdowns. On June 4, a San Diego federal court judge overturned California's three-decade old ban on assault weapons, defined as a semiautomatic rifle or pistol with a detachable magazine and certain features, but granted a 30-day stay for a State appeal and likely future court decisions on the constitutionality of the ban under the Second Amendment. An industry of California legal "featureless" or "compliant" AR-15 style rifles developed for California consumers, adapting to the law with design changes to the popular rifle. (Photo by Patrick T. FALLON / AFP) (Photo by PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images)
A customer examines a gun on sale in Costa Mesa. (Patrick T. Fallon / AFP via Getty Images)

To the editor: As a former paramedic and firefighter, I applaud the California Senate for passing AB 28. As survivors, families, communities and taxpayers, we all pay the enormous costs associated with gun violence, whether we own a firearm or not. The gun industry continues to reap historic profits while its products fuel a costly public health epidemic. Instead of letting firearm-related profits solely benefit the gun industry, this bill would impose a modest 11% excise tax on gun sellers and manufacturers to fund programs remediating and mitigating the harms firearms too often cause in our communities.

Having worked on the frontlines of this epidemic, I know what it looks like when bullets ravage a body and the pain survivors feel in the wake of this violence. I never will be able to unsee these things, but I can see Gov. Newsom signing this bill and in doing so, saving lives.

Michelle Petersen, Alamo

..

To the editor: Recently, the California Legislature passed a measure to tax firearms and ammunition. It will be bitterly opposed and do little to reduce gun violence.

Requiring gun owners to insure their guns against injuries to others caused by their use would be more effective. The gun owner would face a large fine if his uninsured weapon caused injury to another. There could also be a modest fine for the open carrying of an uninsured firearm. This proposal would cause owners to secure their weapons more assuredly, or consider seriously insuring their weapons, and it would provide a fund to partially compensate those injured by firearms. The insurance companies would salivate to expand with this new area of business.

John Neill, San Diego

..

To the editor: As a UC Davis student and Glendale native, I’m thrilled that Assembly Bill 28 passed in the state Senate. This summer, I saw the exceptional work that violence intervention programs do firsthand when I worked with Urban Peace Institute to spotlight their work to high school student activists. From de-escalation on city streets to rehabilitative programs like yoga, which our students loved trying, these programs that would receive funding from AB 28 make our city safer and save lives.

It’s been so rewarding volunteering with other students to pass this bill, including spending hours in a committee hearing to testify in support last April. I can’t wait for Gov. Newsom to sign it so that no more students have to accept gun violence as a daily fact of life.

Roan Thibault, Montrose

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.