Letters: Where's Mike? Gone Fishin' sign might as well be hanging on his door

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine delivers his State of the State address at the Ohio Statehouse in Columbus on March 2, 2022.
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine delivers his State of the State address at the Ohio Statehouse in Columbus on March 2, 2022.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

Has Mike DeWine gone fishin'?

Where’s Waldo? Remember him, the man hidden in a crowd of people and objects?

Like some might say about our own Gov. Mike DeWine. Is there a "Gone Fishin’" sign hanging on his door at the Statehouse?

For all the vacuum of leadership at the helm of our state, he might as well be.

More: Letters: DeWine's signature set 10-year-old up for Indiana abortion. Where is he now?

For those of you who don’t know, he is the Republican incumbent running for reelection in 2022 (sitting on a caboodle of cash), all of which is in his favor to win.

More: Nan who? Better known Mike DeWine has huge poll lead in Ohio governor's race over Whaley

This might explain his apparent gameplay of see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil, in addition to not saying or doing anything that might alienate his Republican base voters.

Yep! Gone fishin’.

Susan B. West, Athens

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas

Believe him? Joe Namath has an offer for you too

The July 21 Michael Lederman column, "Justice Thomas deliberately misunderstands law; hurts court," is a sterling example of ultracrepidarianism.

While I have no doubt that Lederman is well-versed in his field of biomedical ethics, in the field of law he is only a normal individual with a personal opinion.

Michael M. Lederman, M.D., is professor of medicine (emeritus) and biomedical ethics at Case Western Reserve University. He is editor-in-chief of the scientific journal Pathogens and Immunity.
Michael M. Lederman, M.D., is professor of medicine (emeritus) and biomedical ethics at Case Western Reserve University. He is editor-in-chief of the scientific journal Pathogens and Immunity.

To ascribe any degree of expertise in the latter field due to expertise in the former is a classic misapplication which is often leveraged by advocates and advertisers alike.

More: Clarence Thomas calls for Supreme Court to 'reconsider' gay marriage, contraception after Roe v. Wade falls

His diatribe on Clarence Thomas is simply a compilation of screeds promulgated by those opposing the U.S. Supreme Court decisions in which Thomas has participated.

If you believe that Lederman is an expert in constitutional law, then that outstanding medical adviser Joe Namath would like to sell you a Medicare Advantage policy.

John Platt, Arlington

Straw man, party of one

I found the opinions expressed by Michael Lederman in his July 21 guest column, "Justice Thomas deliberately misunderstands law; hurts court," a blatant twisting of facts and presentation of “straw man” arguments.

Even as an opinion piece, it was not worthy of publication.

More: Justice Thomas' lusterless tenure began with a lie. It keeps getting worse. |Opinion

Justice Clarence Thomas has authored 693 opinions through 2019. His selection, despite Anita Hill’s accusations, is simply the reality that there were no facts, only "she said vs. he said."

More: Columbus on Roe v. Wade's end: Dispatch readers share their thoughts on Dobbs decision

That he has political opinions beyond the court is no different than any justice, past or present.

And Lederman would have Thomas removed due to the views or actions of his wife.

Thank goodness the Supreme Court is made up of men and women who are guided by facts and the law, rather than the likes of men like Lederman.

Jay Firebaugh, Gahanna

Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor

Share your thoughts: How to submit a letter to the editor for The Columbus Dispatch

Party no longer represents me

Ann Spicer's July 20 letter, "Lawmakers heartless and cruel," is so right on the feelings of a majority of Ohioans.

I agree with her that Republicans that think a raped 10-year-old girl should be forced to give birth to a child is insane.

More: Letters: My 10-year-old granddaughter is into unicorns. Ohio would force her to give birth

What are the Republicans thinking?

Obviously, not what the majority of Ohioans are thinking. There is a solution to the out-of-touch Republican party. Come November let the majority show them how we feel and vote them out.

More: Capitol Insider: Right to Life leader says 10-year-old could've gotten abortion in Ohio

I am a registered Republican not represented by the current crop of Republican officeholders. There are a great many more people like me that will be voting our feelings. Your vote sends a message.

Chet Ridenour, Worthington

Who else decides 10-year-old's fate?

The July 20 article "Attorney General's race heats up over abortion, rape comments to media" said Dave Yost felt the child involved didn't have to leave Ohio for treatment because she would have qualified for a medical emergency.

Newly elected Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost celebrates his victory in November 2018.
Newly elected Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost celebrates his victory in November 2018.

However, the article went on to say that "doctors and lawmakers disagreed."

More: Ohio AG Dave Yost should resign over comments about 10-year-old rape victim, Democrats say

Who else is there that gets to decide?

Syd Lifshin, Columbus

This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Letters: Columnist Lederman twisted facts about Clarence Thomas