A little-known animal rights group directed a wave of anger at Fauci after NIAID was mistakenly listed as a backer for a beagle study

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·3 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, testifies before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee at the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington on Tuesday, July 20, 2021.
Dr. Anthony Fauci testifies before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee on Tuesday, July 20, 2021.Stefani Reynolds/Associated Press
  • A journal mistakenly listed NIAID as a funder of a study that featured beagles trapped in netting.

  • Images of the beagles went viral and Dr. Anthony Fauci received a swarm of angry calls.

  • An animal rights group used anti-Fauci sentiments to further their cause, The Washington Post reported.

Dr. Anthony Fauci and his office received thousands of calls and a wave of anger after a little-known animal rights group backed a false claim that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases funded inhumane beagle experiments, The Washington Post reported.

The Post reported that Fauci's assistant had to stop answering calls for two weeks because of how frequent they were.

According to the Post, the ordeal began in July when researchers on the study, conducted in Tunisia, released a paper that mistakenly listed NIAID as a funder.

An image from that study that featured beagles trapped in sand-fly-infested netting went viral.

The journal the research was published in issued a correction on October 26, but by that point, the White Coat Waste Project had already "leveraged existing hostility among conservatives toward Fauci to further its cause," the Post reported.

The Post reported that the group used the animosity against Fauci during the pandemic to push the idea that NIAID was funding these studies and continued to use the viral image to do so.

In late October, the group posted a statement claiming that they weren't opposed to Fauci but were just advocating for animal rights.

"To be clear: it is 100% possible to stand 'shoulder to shoulder' with Dr. Fauci on most public policies and issues," the group said in the statement, "but go 'toe to toe' with him on the issue of beagle experiments."

However, by that point, Jeff Yang, a research director at California-based nonprofit Institute for the Future who studies the flow of information online, told the Post it's likely the posts about Fauci had billions of views.

"He's been turned into this supervillain, a caricature of a mad scientist cooking up experiments to torture puppies, and it's kind of mind-bending," Yang told the Post. "The Fauci-puppies meme has become a phenomenon."

The reports even prompted a group of bipartisan lawmakers to send a letter to Fauci on October 21 asking him about animal testing funded by NIAID.

The White Coat Waste Project spokesman Justin Goodman told the Post that they still believe that NIAID funded the study.

Goodman also defended using the anti-Fauci sentiments to push the group's cause.

"When you have such a high-profile person to point the finger at for funding animal experiments, it would be malpractice for us not to do that," he told the Post.

In a comment to Insider, Goodman said "it's an inconvenient truth for the Washington Post" and alleged that NIAID has funded experiments on dogs for years.

"It's unfortunate that partisan media like the Post doesn't understand this, but a majority of its readers — and a majority of Americans — get what #BeagleGate is all about," Goodman said.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting