Lubbock federal judge blocks Biden order requiring doctors to perform abortions in emergencies

A federal judge in Lubbock has blocked enforcement of a Biden administration order requiring hospitals to perform abortions in medical emergencies, siding with state officials who said the federal order should not preempt state law.

Texas sued the federal government over the order in July, arguing that the guidance violates the state’s authority to create and enforce its own laws. As of Thursday, it is illegal for doctors to perform an abortion in the state, except in rare cases in which the pregnant person's life is in jeopardy.

In the late Tuesday order, U.S. District Judge James Wesley Hendrix of Lubbock wrote that the Biden administration “lacked statutory authority” to issue its guidance on emergency abortions and that allowing federal guidance to supersede state law would cause “irreparable harm.”

More:Paxton sues Biden administration over emergency rooms performing abortion to save a life

“The Guidance gives Texas hospitals and physicians license — much more, requires them — to violate Texas abortion laws if their medical judgment says an abortion is required to stabilize the patient in a situation prohibited by Texas law,” said Hendrix, a Trump appointee. “This harms Texas’ legitimate interest in the continued enforceability of its abortion laws.”

Lubbockites protest during a pro-abortion rally at Tim Cole Memorial Park on July 4.
Lubbockites protest during a pro-abortion rally at Tim Cole Memorial Park on July 4.

The Biden administration’s guidance states that emergency room doctors must perform life-saving medical care to pregnant patients who are experiencing an emergency medical condition — even if that care includes an abortion otherwise prohibited by state law. The guidance listed an ectopic pregnancy, complications of pregnancy loss or emergent hypertensive disorders as examples of potential medical conditions that could necessitate an abortion to save a pregnant person.

More:How some students are weighing Texas abortion laws in college decisions

The administration threatened to fine or strip Medicare status from hospitals that failed to follow the guidance, which was issued in the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court ending federal constitutional protections for abortion.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said the Biden administration was attempting to use federal health care regulations to "transform every emergency room in the country into a walk-in abortion clinic."

"Last night, the court ruled in favor of Texas!" he said in a tweet. "A WIN for mothers, babies & the TX healthcare industry."

Pro-life supporters march in downtown Lubbock in 2020.
Pro-life supporters march in downtown Lubbock in 2020.

Hendrix ruled that the administration's guidance, issued under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, goes beyond the scope of federal law and fails to appropriately balance the interests of a pregnant person and their unborn child.

More:Austin passes abortion-related measure, says it will fight Texas GOP on issue

“To the extent that the Guidance would require abortion where Texas would not, Texas law does so to ‘provide the best opportunity for the unborn child to survive’,” the order reads. “The Court will not interject itself in balancing the health of an unborn child and the health of his mother when that balancing is left to the people and their elected representatives.”

Texas has several overlapping bans on abortion, including a statute predating Roe v. Wade that criminalizes all abortions. On Thursday, the state's so-called trigger law will go into effect and make it a felony to perform an abortion at any point in a pregnancy.

This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Lubbock judge blocks Biden order requiring emergency abortion access