Will Musk's rebranding ruin Twitter?

Elon Musk this week announced he was scrapping Twitter's iconic bird logo and renaming the social media platform X. "Soon we shall bid adieu to the Twitter brand and, gradually, all the birds," he declared in a tweet. Workers immediately started taking the Twitter sign off the company's San Francisco headquarters. They relabeled conference rooms — scrapping bird-related names like Aviary, Tern, Bluebird, Canary, and Mallard — with names like "eXposure," "eXult," and "s3Xy," according to The New York Times.

The billionaire Musk is using a letter he clearly loves — it's in the name of rocket company SpaceX and one of his electric cars, the Model X, at Tesla. He even named one of his kids X. The rebranding follows a series of controversial changes Musk has made at the social media company since buying it in October. He has laid off 6,000 employees (80 percent of Twitter's staff), changed and started charging for badges intended to verify users, and invited back users, including former President Donald Trump, who had been banned for violating rules on promoting violence.

Many Twitter users scratched their heads. Some critics called the new name and logo, an angular, stylized X, cold and off-putting. Marketing gurus said Musk was throwing away an iconic brand that is worth billions. Making a brand a verb is the "holy grail," Mike Proulx, a vice president and research director at Forrester, told The New York Times. "The app itself has become a cultural phenomenon in all sorts of ways. In one fell sweep, Elon Musk has essentially wiped out 15 years of brand value from Twitter and is now essentially starting from scratch." The platform formerly known as Twitter is already facing major challenges, like dwindling ad revenue and Meta's launch of rival app Threads. Is Musk dooming his own company by scrapping its valuable brand?

Musk has made Twitter a 'zombie'

Twitter has been officially killed by its "unhinged owner," said Oliver Darcy at CNN. "A zombie Twitter, known only as X, reluctantly endures. A warped and disfigured platform, X marches on like a White Walker, an ugly shell of its former self under the command of a loathsome leader." Musk has single-handedly transformed Twitter from a "fountain of authoritative information" into a platform "where trolls can pay a small fee to have their ugly content boosted ahead of reputable sources." On X, "journalists are banned or smeared while the most repellant and dishonest voices are elevated." The rules are unclear; the infrastructure is crumbling. X has none of Twitter's brand recognition but all of Musk's "toxic" baggage that has driven away users and advertisers.

It's oddly fitting that Musk is replacing the user-friendly "Twitter birdie" logo with the cold, angular X, said Virginia Heffernan in the Los Angeles Times. Musk's plans for the company clearly don't call for a "cute or optimistic or uptilted" image. "The name X and a severe, black logo are more apt for whatever baffling and galactic storm-trooping Musk wants to do with his interplanetary empire." With dangerous artificial intelligence set to fast replace more cuddly social media, maybe it's good to embrace design that says "keep out" rather than "come in." If "Twitter-turned-X is toxic," it might be good, for users if not the company, that its logo "recalls the skull-and-crossbones on cartoon bottles of poison."

Musk wants to build something bigger than Twitter

Musk is dumping the Twitter brand because he's out to build something bigger, said Arjun Kharpal at CNBC. He said in October that he was spending $44 billion to buy Twitter  as an "accelerant to creating X, the everything app." People have compared his vision to a made-in-the-U.S.A. version of China's WeChat, the world's "biggest super app" operated by Chinese technology giant Tencent. WeChat lets its 1.3 billion users send instant messages like Meta's WhatsApp, but it also offers payments and a way to access e-commerce, banking, and other apps. But "trying to turn X into anything like WeChat is going to be a mammoth task," particularly because Musk won't benefit from "the factors that [have] helped the Chinese app's success — including China's 'mobile-first market'" and Beijing's blocking of potential foreign competitors like Twitter and Google.

Musk has already failed, said Jennifer Rubin at The Washington Post. He spent billions on an established company and turned it "into a cesspool of disinformation and hate speech," losing "more than two-thirds of the company's value." He's not building something bigger; he's presiding over the demise of something whose time has come, and gone. "Products and industries go out of fashion; customers spend their money elsewhere." If you run a great company, "keep valuable employees productive and please customers," you "grow and make money." If you "create havoc," fire your team, and "annoy customers," your employees find work elsewhere, and new rivals — like Meta's new Threads app — pop up to fill the gap. So when "rotten owners" like Musk fail, it's just a sign that capitalism is working as it should.

You may also like

Homepage