Expert weighs in on judge’s decision to disallow some evidence in Alec Baldwin trial
SANTA FE, N.M. (KRQE) – In Santa Fe County District Court on Monday, Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer addressed several key issues in a motion hearing for Alec Baldwin’s upcoming involuntary manslaughter trial. Baldwin faces charges following the 2021 shooting on the set of the film “Rust,” which resulted in the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.
Related Coverage
Rust shooting investigation files released by Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office
Warrant reveals gun not thoroughly checked before movie set shooting; sheriff not ruling out charges
Halyna Hutchins: What we know about the cinematographer killed by prop gun
Sheriff: Alec Baldwin discharged prop gun on movie set that killed 1, injured another
Attorneys: Charge to be dropped against Alec Baldwin in fatal ‘Rust’ shooting case
Judge Sommer expressed difficulty with the prosecution’s argument that Baldwin, as a producer, failed to follow guidelines. “I’m having real difficulty with the state’s position that they want to show as a producer he didn’t follow guidelines,” the judge stated. This led her to rule against the state’s attempt to introduce Baldwin’s producer role as evidence. “I’m denying evidence of his status as a producer,” Judge Sommer said.
The prosecution and defense debated over what evidence should be admissible in court. The judge ruled that the jury would not hear about Baldwin’s behavior on set, including allegations of him yelling at crew members, nor testimony blaming Assistant Director David Halls, who pled no contest to negligent use of a firearm for failing to properly check the gun.
Legal experts believe these rulings could impact the prosecution’s case. Professor Joshua Kastenberg of the University of New Mexico School of Law commented on the pre-trial evidentiary rulings. “Anytime the judge issued an evidentiary ruling like this on the eve of a trial, it caused me to have to shift trial tactics, and it generally wasn’t good for the case I was presenting,” Kastenberg said, drawing from his experience as a federal prosecutor.
As the trial approaches, it remains to be seen how Monday’s rulings will affect the outcome. Professor Kastenberg states, “I think you can’t really get a flavor of the case until you hear the opening statements of the prosecution.”
Court proceedings are expected to pick back up on Tuesday with jury selection and the trial is expected to last until July 19.
Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
