Viewpoint: Dispelling solar energy myths
In the midst of Northwest Indiana's ongoing discussions about economic development and solar energy, I often hear comments suggesting that these projects will bring more harm than good.
With so much changing suddenly around here, it’s only natural for concerns to arise. I know and respect everyone’s opinions, but believe it is best to base such decisions on facts. So I decided to look at some recent research that examined how solar projects impact their communities. Based on this research and my own observations of the solar projects underway in our community, I feel it is important to point out the research-based facits that dispel many of the negative claims circling in the communities:
False claim: Solar projects negatively impact biodiversity.
Fact: Large-scale solar projects actually sustain and increase natural biodiversity. The shade provided by solar panels enhances floral abundance, attracting more insects, pollinators and bird species. This added shade also prevents soil moisture loss, boosting plant growth and diversity according to a 2018 study by First Solar. Solar developers often invest in habitat restoration once solar projects are installed and after a project’s lifespan.
False claim: Solar energy is more expensive than fossil fuels and completely dependent on subsidies.
Fact: The unsubsidized cost of utility-scale solar was $60 per megawatt hour (MWh), according to a 2023 study conducted by Lazard Asset Management, while the mean unsubsidized cost of gas was $70 per MWh and $117 per MWh when it comes to coal. Solar accounted for only 33% of total renewable energy subsidies in 2022, totaling $7.4 billion according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. At the moment, solar accounts for more subsidies, in the same year, while the coal and gas industries received $2.1 billion in federal subsidies. Even when considering government subsidies, subsidized and unsubsidized solar remains the cheaper form of energy production compared to coal and gas at their most cost-competitive peaks.
False claim: The value of properties decrease when near solar projects.
Fact: Research indicates that solar panels may either maintain or increase property values. For instance, a 2018 investigation on solar projects in Indiana and Illinois concluded that neighboring properties showed "no consistent negative impact" attributable to their proximity to the solar installations. Some researchers even found that properties close to solar projects sold for a slightly higher average compared to properties not near any solar farms.
False claim: Solar projects are harmful to human health.
Fact: According to a recent study by North Carolina State University, the electromagnetic fields generated at solar projects are comparable in strength to those of household appliances like toaster ovens. They pose no risk of negative health impacts.
Solar energy has the potential to be a positive game-changer for Indiana, if we give it the appropriate opportunity. The advantages extend far beyond electricity generation. Its cost-effectiveness is unmatched, allowing us to diversify our energy portfolio, fortify our grid against disruptions and reduce the burden of electric bills for residents and businesses alike. Moreover, the adoption of solar power promotes environmental sustainability by improving soil conditions and ensuring a healthier ecosystem for future generations to thrive.
We’ve got a new neighbor in solar energy and we should treat them as such.
Jacob Everett is CEcD & founder of Corsa Strategies, a renewable energy site selection and advisory firm in Indianapolis.
This article originally appeared on South Bend Tribune: The truth about solar energy
