NRA’s Wayne LaPierre claims he’s being pressured to resign

For more than 25 years, Wayne LaPierre has defined the aggressive, no-compromise approach of the National Rifle Association.

When 20 children were murdered in their classrooms in Newtown, Connecticut in 2012, LaPierre, the group’s executive vice-president, refused to consider any new gun control laws. “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,” he told reporters.

When teenage survivors of last year’s Parkland school shooting organized nationwide protests against the NRA, which they called the March for Our Lives, LaPierre remained defiant. The only march that mattered was “the march to the polls on election day”, he told the group’s members last May.

But the NRA’s most famous spokesman is now on the defensive, caught up in a bitter civil war among the group’s top leaders and consultants. On Thursday night, LaPierre wrote a letter to the NRA’s board, claiming that he was being pressured to resign by organization’s current president and by the group’s longtime public relations firm, Ackerman McQueen, the Wall Street Journal reported.

LaPierre wrote that he was warned on Wednesday that, unless he resigned, damaging allegations would be made to the board against him regarding sexual harassment of a staff member and “accusations of wardrobe expenses and excessive staff travel expenses”.

Related: Donald Trump to address NRA with gun lobby in disarray

In the letter, which was obtained and published by the Journal, LaPierre said the pressure to resign came from the organization’s current president, Lt. Oliver North, and others, and was “styled, in the parlance of extortionists, as an offer I can’t refuse”.

The central issue, LaPierre wrote, was the lawsuit the NRA filed last week against Ackerman McQueen, accusing the company of withholding key details from its bills to the gun group and demanding more transparency.

LaPierre was told, he wrote, that “I needed to withdraw the lawsuit against [Ackerman McQueen] or be smeared.”

An internal battle between top NRA leaders and Ackerman McQueen has been escalating for months, and exploded into public view with the suit’s filing last week.

The filing came days before the New Yorker and the Trace, a not-for-profit organization focused on covering gun violence, published an investigation detailing allegations of financial mismanagement, nepotism, greed and self-dealing among employees of both the NRA and Ackerman McQueen, which has helped define the NRA’s strategy and talking points for decades.

Central to the NRA’s lawsuit was a demand for information about a separate financial contract Ackerman McQueen had with North, a prominent and combative conservative commenter who was once at the heart of the Iran-Contra affair.

North was unexpectedly named as the NRA’s president, traditionally a largely symbolic role, a year ago, replacing the gun industry executive Pete Brownell. A spokesman for Brownell noted that Brownell said at the time that he was stepping down to focus on his family and his business, and that he remained on the board.

The gun rights group declined to comment on whether the replacement of Brownell with North had anything to do with Brownell’s participation in a 2015 trip to Moscow to meet with Russian officials, which was organized by Maria Butina, a Russian woman sentenced to 18 months in prison today after she tried to infiltrate the National Rifle Association to promote Russian political interests in the 2016 election.