Op-Ed: Last year, fire devastated the sequoia. How we can prevent that from happening again

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
SPRINGVILLE, CA - OCTOBER 28: Sunset obscured by smoke filled skies near Alder Creek Grove where Sequoia trees had grown on this Sierra Nevada ridgetop for well over 500 years. Christy Brigham, science chief of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks has known since she arrived in Sequoia-Kings Canyon five years ago that the parks' average of 1,000 acres a year of controlled burns is not enough but there's the public's dislike of smoke from controlled burns. People call up their congressional offices, which then tell the forest: Don't let the burns go on too long. But one way or another, there's going to be smoke in the Sierra. Giant Sequoia National Monument on Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2020 in Springville, CA. (Al Seib / Los Angeles Times
A grove of sequoia trees, pictured Oct. 28, had grown on a Sierra Nevada ridgetop for well over 500 years before burning. (Los Angeles Times)

The massive cinnamon trunks of the Sierra Nevada’s giant sequoia now tower silently over blanketing snow. But many of those trunks are newly blackened, a stark reminder of the devastating fires of last fall, and a heartbreaking foreshadowing of the tree mortality that the spring thaw will reveal. The devastation from the wildfires that swept through the groves last year was unprecedented, killing ancient trees that had lived comfortably with fire for millennia.

With looming drought, it won’t be long before the next fire season is upon us. Gov. Gavin Newsom, in his State of the State address, rightly commended the “heroic efforts” by firefighters in eventually subduing last year’s blazes. But depending on their heroics after fires are already upon us is not a sufficient strategy to stem irretrievable losses. We have to get ready now. The U.S. Forest Service and other agencies that manage these groves need the resources to ensure that we don’t suffer this kind of loss again.

For centuries, Indigenous peoples lived among the giant sequoia — known as “wawona” by some tribes and Toos-pung-ish or Hea-mi-withic by the Tule River Tribe. Indigenous stewardship included fire as a critical element of sustaining balance in the Sierra.

Between natural and Indigenous fires, giant sequoia evolved to thrive with fire about every eight to 15 years, according to Save the Redwoods League, the organization I lead. The protective bark of a mature tree can be up to two feet thick, and fire helps their cones open and release seeds, fostering reproduction. That’s the way it worked until the early 20th century, when, following the removal of tribal stewards, land managers began suppressing fire in the Sierra Nevada.

Because of this suppression, today’s wildfires are different. Without frequent low- to moderate-severity fires to clear out the underbrush and small trees, wildfires burn hotter and move faster. Between 1950 and 2014, only about 9% of giant sequoia groves saw any fire, based on Save the Redwoods League calculations. Then suddenly, in the last five years, roughly 65% of the range burned from either human or natural causes, with a level of sequoia mortality never seen before. We created a tinderbox, and now the sequoia are paying for it.

Following the 2017 Pier fire, our researchers were shocked to find an unprecedented 86 monarchs — trees with trunks four feet or wider — killed within the Giant Sequoia National Monument. They were still assessing those losses when the SQF Complex/Castle Fire swept through in 2020, killing potentially thousands more trees, confirming a horrifying and preventable new normal. That wildfire would eventually burn through roughly one-third of the entire giant sequoia range. Roughly 40% of those acres burned at a high enough severity to kill monarchs.

To put that loss in perspective, giant sequoia grow naturally in only about 73 small groves over about 48,000 acres, less than half the size of Bakersfield. Unlike coast redwoods that resprout from burnt trunks or roots, when giant sequoia lose their crowns to fire, they don’t come back. And last year’s fires killed many trees that were well over thousands of years of old.

While many factors, including climate change, contributed to the devastation, it is the unnatural buildup of vegetation that we must address right now. Prescribed fire and thinning are critical techniques to setting these forests back on a healthy path. Currently the Forest Service can treat only a few hundred acres a year in the giant sequoia groves — not nearly enough to save the trees.

More funding would be money well spent. More than $122 million of taxpayer money was used to fight the SQF Complex/Castle Fire. Treating the giant sequoia groves with prescribed fire would cost a fraction of that and result in far better outcomes.

Gov. Newsom earmarked $1 billion in his proposed 2020-21 state budget for forestry and wildfire resilience, and conservationists hope that some of this money could support a conservation partnership with the Forest Service. The 2020 Great American Outdoors Act includes $9.5 billion to spend on federal parks and public lands over five years. As California legislators and Congress allocate this money, they must make it a priority to avoid losing any more of the irreplaceable giant sequoia. Investing in prevention — while committing to workforce development and reducing bureaucratic hurdles — would help the trees and create economic opportunity in California’s rural communities.

Given the breadth of the wildfire crisis the federal government faces throughout the West, work could be accelerated in the giant sequoia range through a coalition of federal, state, tribal and nongovernmental organization partners, mirroring the partnership currently restoring coast redwood forests in Northern California.

These investments need to be made quickly before tomorrow’s fires take any more of our state’s greatest natural treasures.

Sam Hodder is president and CEO of Save the Redwoods League.

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting