Residents dig out after nor'easter dumps more than 2 feet of snow in Allentown
The nor'easter storm dumped over 27 inches of snow in Allentown, Pennsylvania, but the city, and its residents, are resilient and ready to dig-out.
The Postal Service just decided it's time to get weird.
For the first time ever, NASA has captured video of a rover landing on the surface of Mars, plus audio of the wind whistling past it after the landing — and Amazon Web Services is playing a key role in making all those gigabytes of goodness available to the world. The stars of the show are NASA’s Perseverance rover and the hundreds of scientists and engineers supporting the mission to Mars at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and other institutions around the world. But the fact that thousands of images are being pumped out via NASA’s website with only a few… Read More
But first, scientists need to see if it's ready.
Imagine charging your Apple Watch with ... yourself.
Because if it’s not a sharp knife, it’s not a good knife.
The bomber is bound for an early retirement in the Arizona desert.
A new experiment shows it's possible to talk to dreaming people—and actually hear back.
Christopher Havens got his number theory problem published in a college-level mathematics magazine.
Here's the sneaky way to find out where practically any picture came from.
An evaporative or ultrasonic humidifier will defend you from winter’s dry air.
If your water is potentially contaminated, you must kill the germs before you drink it.
These compact table saws easily go where the work is: outside, in the garage, or to the job site.
Expert-tested essentials for hunting deer, elk, ducks, birds, and beyondFrom Popular Mechanics
They say that the second vaccine shot for COVID-19 is rougher than the first one — and we’re not just talking about the side effects. As a newly double-vaccinated member of the 65-and-older set, I can vouch for the claim that the side effects can be felt more acutely the second time around: Back in late January, my first Pfizer-BioNTech shot gave me nothing more than a sore arm. This week’s second shot gave me body aches the day after, as if I had been shoveling snow for hours. (Which, come to think of it, I was … a couple… Read More
Prefer pen and paper to a smartphone or tablet? These smart notebooks will let you take notes the old-fashioned way and easily digitize them.From Popular Mechanics
A federal judge on Tuesday indefinitely banned the Biden administration from enforcing a 100-day pause on deportations of most illegal immigrants in response to a lawsuit from Texas, which argued that the moratorium violated federal law and could saddle the state with additional costs. U.S. district judge Drew Tipton issued a preliminary injunction Tuesday, dealing a blow to President Biden’s efforts to follow through on his campaign promise to pause most deportations. The pause would not have applied to those who have engaged in terrorism or espionage or who pose a danger to national security. It would also have excluded those who were not present in the U.S. before November 1, 2020, those who agreed to waive the right to remain, and those whom the ICE director individually determined need to be removed by law. Tipton first ruled on January 26 that the pause violated federal law on administrative procedure and that the U.S. failed to show why a deportation pause was justified. He issued a temporary two-week restraining order, which was set to expire Tuesday. Texas attorney general Ken Paxton argued that Biden’s January 20 memorandum violated federal law and an agreement with the Department of Homeland Security that Texas be consulted before reducing immigration enforcement or pausing deportations. As part of the agreement, DHS must give Texas 180 days notice of any proposed change on any matter that would reduce enforcement or increase the number of “removable or inadmissible aliens” in the United States. However, the ruling does not require deportations to resume at their previous pace and immigration agencies have broad discretion in enforcing removals and processing cases. In the wake of the first ruling, authorities deported hundreds of people to Central America and 15 people to Jamaica. The administration has also continued deportations that began under the Trump administration due to a public-health law in response to the coronavirus pandemic.
The Food and Drug Administration appears to be closing in on an emergency use authorization for the single-dose Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine, which a large clinical trial has shown to be safe and effective. And the "most encouraging" aspect in the FDA's analysis may be the data that suggest the shot works in areas where highly contagious variants are spreading, like Brazil and South Africa. The overall efficacy rate — that is, protection against any symptomatic infection — in the South African trial was lower than it was in the United States initially, but the numbers did start to even out over time, and after a month, the shot's efficacy rate against severe infections was 82 percent. The figures out of Brazil show a similar trajectory, though the efficacy rate against severe infections was actually slightly higher than in the U.S. FDA just posted briefing documents for its expert panel discussing the J&J Covid shot Friday. This is the first clear breakdown I've seen of efficacy in areas w/ variant spread, but shows efficacy building over time: pic.twitter.com/YReI2QkvZa — Sarah Owermohle (@owermohle) February 24, 2021 Of course, the trial data is not a guarantee of the vaccine's effectiveness in a real-world setting, but the FDA's breakdown should still help alleviate growing concerns that the so-called South African variant, especially, can completely resist vaccinations, an outcome that would add to the challenge of slowing the pandemic going forward. More stories from theweek.comThe MyPillow guy might be Trump's ultimate chumpBiden is leaving Amazon workers out in the coldInvestors say Trump properties are worthless until his name is removed
The actress said she was "in a state of shock" when Jim Parsons said he wanted to leave the series, which ended the popular CBS sitcom.
A divorce court in China has ordered a man to pay his wife £5,500 as compensation for the housework she did during their five-year marriage, in what is believed to be a landmark legal first. Beijing’s Fangshan District Court ruled in favour of the woman, who had complained that her husband “didn’t care about or participate in any kind of chores around the house,” according to China Women’s News, the official publication of the state-backed All-China Women’s Federation. Each day, the husband went out to work leaving her to care for their child and do all the housework, said the woman, who was identified in state media reports by her surname, Wang. The ruling, which effectively puts a monetary value on housework. The court ordered Wang’s husband, identified as Chen, to pay 50,000 yuan for neglecting his share of the domestic duties. Such a judgment was made possible through a new civil code, which came into effect at the beginning of the year. The new provisions allow for a spouse who shoulders more responsibility in caring for children or elderly relatives, or carrying out unpaid housework, to request compensation from their partner in the event of a divorce. Both parties should negotiate the amount between them, but if they fail to agree a court can decide for them. Feng Miao, the presiding judge, told Chinese media that while the division of a couple’s assets usually involves “tangible property … housework may constitute intangible property value”, and help to promote “the other spouse's personal growth, and chances to receive further education”. The court also ruled that Wang and Chen’s property should be divided equally between them. It awarded Wang custody of their child, and ordered Chen to pay 2,000 yuan (£220) in monthly child support. The judgement is being appealed, although it wasn’t clear whether Chen or Wang launched the appeal. He Xin, a professor at the University of Hong Kong’s Faculty of Law, said that he wasn’t surprised by the ruling. “China is a country that has wonderful legal principles on gender equality so I don’t think it’s strange or unexpected if some judges make a ruling according to the law,” said Professor He. The problem is that in practice, he said, there is systematic bias against women on issues in divorce cases, including division of property and child custody. “China is not really a very gender equal society … so for whether to grant a divorce, for example, usually the majority of the plaintiffs are women, they want to get divorced, but if the men are resistant, on the first petition the court usually rules against the divorce petition, no matter whether there is domestic violence,” he added. Women in China used social media to show support for the ruling – but said the compensation given for years of housework was too little. “If she were a hard-working cleaner she could have earned more than this amount in half a year,” wrote one. “The price for being a full-time mother is job opportunities, social experiences, time, networking, and so on,” lamented another. “50,000 yuan is too little.” Another said the ruling was, at least, “a good start”, and hoped that it meant that the needs of full-time mothers would start to receive more attention. Chinese society still expects wives to do the bulk of housework, child-rearing and caring for family members, a notion that has been boosted under President Xi Jinping, who has called on women to “shoulder the responsibilities of taking care of the old and the young”. Additional reporting by Yiyin Zhong
Asked whether the company would sue Fox News after Mike Lindell, Dominion CEO John Poulos said the voting-machine company was "not ruling anyone out."