SCOTUS EPA decision could spell doom for Delaware's wetlands. Here's how
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v. EPA turns on its head 50 years of congressionally directed and science-based protection of the nation’s wetlands. The implications of this decision will leave most of Delaware’s freshwater wetlands — which represent about 15% of Delaware’s landscape — without any Federal or state protections.
The Federal Clean Water Act explicitly charges EPA to restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the nation’s waters. Scientists have long known that to provide that protection, regulators would have to respect the interconnectedness of the land and waters including the crucial water quality role played by wetlands.
This Supreme Court decision flies in the face of that science and states that EPA jurisdiction — and therefore the protections provided by the Federal Clean Water Act — should apply only to those wetlands with a direct connection to waterways protected under that act. This decision fails to recognize the thousands of peer-reviewed scientific articles that detail the critical water quality role played by wetlands through their surface and indirect groundwater connections to streams and rivers. Dr. Dave Arscott, executive director of the esteemed Stroud Water Research Center, has aptly noted that “Aquatic systems are dependent on each other and interconnected, even when we can’t see water flowing. To not recognize the connection between wetlands and nearby streams and groundwater contradicts watershed science, and it makes the water resources Americans rely on for drinking, swimming, and recreation more vulnerable to pollution and flooding .”
Since the 1700s, Delaware has lost about half of its wetlands and within the past 10 and 15 years, the state has lost more than 3,000 additional acres . Now unprotected by federal law, many of Delaware’s freshwater wetlands are threatened by discharges as well as destruction and modification that will have a direct adverse effect on the ability of wetlands to support the unique plant and animal life that define our natural spaces. And as those natural habitats disappear, so too will their ability to soak up and store the increased rainfall resulting from more powerful climate change-driven storms, filter harmful levels of nutrients and mitigate climate change by storing carbon. Excess rainwater will now occupy our neighborhoods and flood our streets and roads, carrying into our streams, rivers, lakes and bays all the grease, heavy metals, animal wastes and other pollutants that the wetlands would otherwise have filtered free of charge. In aggregate, these benefits provide $1 billion in economic value to the state of Delaware each year. Squandering these amazing resources is surely not what Congress intended in 1970 when it required the EPA, and by extension the states, to restore and maintain our water quality.
For many years, Delaware has wrestled with the need for and the means to protect its wetlands under state law. Indeed, Delaware is the only mid-Atlantic state without its own freshwater wetland regulations. Never has the need for that protection been more urgent. Now is the time for the Delaware Legislature and the governor to build off enactment of the Clean Water for Delaware Act to ensure this foundation of Delaware’s clean water for future is not lost. The federal government has retreated, and the state of Delaware now has the opportunity and obligation to establish the required law and regulations to protect these critical natural assets.
Freshwater wetlands are an essential natural component of our state’s integrated water system including streams, rivers, ponds, groundwater, estuaries and bays. Freshwater wetlands of all sizes are also critically important for biodiversity — many rare plants and animals live only in wetlands, and many more use them at some point in their lives. Studies have shown that even the smallest wetlands play an important role in aggregate across the landscape, and as they are lost, the remaining wetlands increase in value for people, plants and animals. These assets are also an important tool for protecting communities from the impacts of climate change, especially as they help absorb heavier downpours; constructing flood control infrastructure to substitute for wetlands will only be more costly in the long run. The Delaware Clean Water Alliance will rely on its robust understanding of the science of wetlands to expand public understanding of the threat they face without state protection and ensure well-informed advocacy to fix this very real and harmful gap in critical environmental protection.
Christophe Tulou is executive director of the Delaware Center for the Inland Bays in Rehoboth Beach.
This article originally appeared on Asbury Park Press: How the SCOTUS EPA decision could spell doom for Delaware's wetlands
