Shed a tear for Bill Cosby apologists – they have no argument now that Weinstein has been convicted

Nicole Vassell
Much has rested on this case, not least the possibility that it could bring about a shift in the centuries-old status quo: Getty

Earlier this week, when a New York jury found Harvey Weinstein guilty of rape in the third degree, there was something of a collective sigh of relief across the internet and the news-reading public who’d been keeping up with this story since it first broke in October 2017.

Finally, after years of making the lives of women in Hollywood hell, a slice of justice – and a landmark moment in the #MeToo timeline. With the claims against the former producer having triggered a snowball effect of men in the entertainment industry and elsewhere being held to account for often decades-worth of abuses, seeing Weinstein convicted gives us a reason to exhale.

However, now that Weinstein has been found guilty, let’s observe a moment of silence for those who no longer have their go-to line of defence for the convicted crimes of Bill Cosby. As with the collapse of this major name in the line-up of famous abusers, so falls the argument that some have used to defend Cosby, who is currently serving time in prison for the drugging and sexual assault of Andrea Constand.

There have been a number of those who have defended the likes of Cosby by using Weinstein’s lack of conviction as a point to fall back on when black male celebrities are also in the firing line for these crimes; people have used Weinstein’s former freedom as a rebuttal and an example of racism unfairly dethroning a black person of influence. R Kelly, who is currently in custody facing federal charges that include child pornography, kidnapping and forced labour, is another figure who has been defended by fans with the Weinstein excuse – “Why should Weinstein be walking free, when R Kelly isn’t?”

However, this logic is fundamentally flawed. Declaring Cosby’s sentencing unjust as compared to that of a white man’s implies that he deserves the chance to escape prosecution. It’s not an argument borne out of concern for the accusers, it’s one that wants him to be afforded the privilege to abuse without criminal punishment – and it’s unacceptable.

To watch people I admire fall on their own swords in this way has been disappointing, to say the least. Snoop Dogg, Erykah Badu and Taraji P Henson are examples of celebrities who’ve used the “What about Weinstein?” line as a reaction to black men in entertainment being accused of crimes. And in some senses, you can see where this desire to defend black icons comes from – the years of entertainment or the ways they’ve broken ground for those who’ve come after them. However, this is in no way worth the expense of the people who have directly suffered as a result of their actions.

It is hard enough for people to come forward about sexual abuse without people online continuing to stand up for an abuser’s “greatness”, and moving the conversation back to the value of their work. In both Cosby’s and Weinstein’s cases, it’s because of this career success that kept their accusers quiet for so long – their power and reverence made them “untouchable”, and this silence, and lack of repercussions, helped them repeat their actions time and time again.

I’ll be among the first to proudly call out discrimination when it happens to people of colour – black people in particular – because the fact remains that systemic racism means black people are overpoliced, and often face tougher sentences than their white counterparts for the same crimes. However, this isn’t an instance that holds up to the same examination. There are plenty of privileges that black people are denied, but the right to assault without facing justice isn’t one worth fighting for.

If your first reaction to hearing about the harmful acts of black icons, even with dozens of testimonies standing as evidence, was to ask “What about Weinstein?”, it’s essential to question where this concern was truly coming from. Whether it’s Weinstein or Cosby in the docks, the survivors’ testimonies are equally horrific and deserving of justice.

According to reports at the time of writing, Weinstein faces five to 25 years behind bars. This is a moment for relief that justice is finally done, and the death of the Weinstein excuse that has derailed many important conversations. Abuse and assault allegations should not be a game of who’s allowed to get away with what – so now that the most prolific of the #MeToo abusers has been convicted, we should all be anticipating the downfall of the next abuser – no matter their race.

Read more

Harvey Weinstein rape conviction ‘would not have happened in UK’

Where is Harvey Weinstein and where will he be detained?

Harvey Weinstein taken to hospital ‘with chest pains’ after conviction

Bill Cosby tweets thank you to Snoop Dogg from inside prison