Some state governors have blamed pandemic-related unemployment benefits for discouraging workers from finding new jobs. However, new data suggests that for the 12 states that terminated unemployment benefits early, it isn’t working.
Job hunting in the 12 states that ended federal unemployment programs — including the extra $300 a week — has been subtle, indicating that the strategy may not be working as planned, according to a new analysis by Indeed published Tuesday and as reported by CNBC. The original expiration date was September 6.
There are 25 Republican-led states to end unemployment programs early. According to Daniel Zhao, a senior economist at Glassdoor, 3.9 million Americans will be affected by these state decisions, reports CNBC.
Popular job site Indeed found that job searches were 4% below the national average for Alaska, Iowa, Mississippi and Missouri, which halted the federal benefits June 12, noted CNBC. In Alabama, Idaho, Indiana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, West Virginia and Wyoming — which ended benefits June 19 — searches were 1% lower.
Governors claimed that these benefits were an incentive to stay home, contributing to the worker shortage felt across the nation, mentioned CNBC. Meanwhile, critics argued that these federal programs aren’t making a big impact on people’s decisions and that reeling back benefits will only hurt the economy.
“The share of national job search activity in these states, measured by clicks on job postings, is below the late April baseline,” said Jed Kolko, chief economist at the Indeed Hiring Lab. “If overly generous federal UI benefits were holding back job seekers, then we would expect search activity to increase, relative to the national trend, in states where those benefits have ended.”
More From GOBankingRates
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Terminating Employment Benefits Early Is Not Encouraging People to Find Work