Threat of losing Crimea might force Putin to back down — report

In a leaked Zoom call with officials, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said that losing Crimea is a "red line" for Russian dictator Vladimir Putin, The Hill reported on Aug. 17.

However, the United States thinks that Ukraine liberating the peninsula is not a realistic or even “worthwhile” goal.

Read also: White House ‘skeptical’ about effectiveness of Ukrainian strikes on Crimea — report

Foreign journalists share these doubts. As per their analysis, to isolate Crimea, Ukraine's counteroffensive needs to advance towards Melitopol (Zaporizhzhya Oblast), Armyansk, or Skadovsk. These vectors of attack were hindered after Russia blew up the Kakhovka HEP dam in June. At the same time, recently Ukrainian troops managed to make a successful incursion across the Dnipro River.

Read also: Explosions rock occupied city of Melitopol, says mayor

Before controlling Melitopol, Ukrainian military forces would still need to liberate Tokmak, currently surrounded by an elaborate system of Russian trenches, minefields, and barricades. Furthermore, Russia currently has over 90,000 troops stationed there.

“Whatever Putin says about protecting the Russian-speakers of Luhansk and Donetsk, his current priority is to hold onto Crimea,” the article says.

Read also: Putin pressuring oligarchs to shore up rapidly devaluing ruble — report

“Russian offensives in northern Ukraine, and threats from Wagner mercenaries in Belarus, are diversions. In the center, Bakhmut offers little tactical advantage for either side.”

The journalists conclude by saying that even Ukraine threatens Crimea enough to force Putin to negotiate, it would be merely a delaying tactic, as his long-term goals will “never change” as long as he stays in power.

We’re bringing the voice of Ukraine to the world. Support us with a one-time donation, or become a Patron!

Read the original article on The New Voice of Ukraine