Amazon Testimony May Have Been Untruthful, Top Democrat Says

Ben Brody

(Bloomberg) -- A House Democrat leading a broad antitrust investigation into large technology companies suggested that an Amazon.com Inc. executive may not have been fully truthful during testimony about the company’s practices.

Representative David Cicilline expressed dissatisfaction with Amazon’s answers at a July 16 hearing before the House antitrust panel, according to a letter he sent to the company Tuesday. He also wrote to Facebook Inc. and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.

“I was deeply troubled by the evasive, incomplete, or misleading answers received to basic questions directed to these companies by members of the subcommittee,” Cicilline said in a statement, adding it wasn’t clear “whether these responses stemmed from their lack of preparation, purposeful evasion, or a failure by these companies to select appropriate witnesses for the hearing.”

Cicilline is targeting the companies amid heightened scrutiny in Washington by lawmakers and antitrust enforcers and broadsides by President Donald Trump. The giants of the industry are under fire over massive collection of user data, failing to police content on their platforms, and claims that are harming competition in their markets.

The Rhode Island Democrat focused on testimony by Amazon lawyer Nate Sutton that the company doesn’t use data it collects on sales to favor its own products over third-party sellers.

Cicilline cited a media report in which a former Amazon employee in product management claimed to have pulled “sellers’ data to look at what the best products were,” according to an excerpt in the lawmaker’s letter.

Read More: Big Tech Is Taking a Bipartisan Beating All Over Washington

The letter asked questions about Amazon’s relationship with third parties that sell on its platform. Critics of the company have said it can use the data it collects about sales to favor its own products and squelch competition. The letter also asks about Amazon’s share of the online retail market and about its cloud-computing business.

Cicilline queried Google on whether its “guiding principle” is to send users off its own sites after they conduct a search as well as an agreement with Apple Inc. for Google to be the default search engine on Apple devices. He asked Facebook about its evaluation of start-ups for acquisitions, among other issues.

Apple, which also testified at the hearing, did not receive a letter, a spokesman for Cicilline said.

Spokeswomen for Amazon and Facebook didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment on the letters. A spokeswoman for Google declined to comment.

On July 16, Cicilline said his inquiry is still in the fact-gathering stage but should eventually lead to legislative steps that go beyond self-regulation, including potentially new resources for antitrust agencies.

To contact the reporter on this story: Ben Brody in Washington at btenerellabr@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Sara Forden at sforden@bloomberg.net, David McLaughlin

For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com

©2019 Bloomberg L.P.