UN court orders Myanmar to prevent Rohingya genocide

The mainly Muslim African nation of The Gambia brought the case against Myanmar after 740,000 Rohingya fled over the border into Bangladesh, carrying accounts of widespread rape, arson and mass killings (AFP Photo/Ye Aung THU) (AFP/File)
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

The Hague (AFP) - The UN's highest court ordered Myanmar on Thursday to do everything in its power to prevent the genocide of Rohingya Muslims,rex as international justice stepped into the crisis for the first time.

In a unanimous ruling, the International Court of Justice rejected arguments made by Myanmar's civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi in The Hague in December and set out urgent steps for the predominantly Buddhist nation to end the violence.

The mainly Muslim African state of The Gambia had asked the court to impose the emergency measures -- pending a full case that could take years -- following a bloody military crackdown by Myanmar in 2017 that sent around 740,000 Rohingya fleeing into neighbouring Bangladesh.

The ICJ's presiding judge, Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf, said that "the court was of the opinion that the Rohingya in Myanmar remain extremely vulnerable".

Thousands are suspected to have been killed in the crackdown and refugees brought widespread reports of rape and arson in Rakhine state by Myanmar's military and local Buddhist militias.

The court ordered Myanmar to "take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts" described by the 1948 UN Genocide Convention, under which Gambia brought the case.

These acts included "killing members of the group" and "deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part."

The court ordered Myanmar to report back within four months, and then every six months after that. It also told Myanmar to prevent the destruction of any evidence of crimes against the Rohingya.

- 'Distorted picture' -

Myanmar however remained defiant, with its foreign ministry insisting after the ruling that "there was no genocide in Rakhine".

"The unsubstantiated condemnation of Myanmar by some human rights actors has presented a distorted picture of the situation," it said in a statement, adding that Thursday's decision "in no way prejudges" the longer-term legal case.

Nobel peace laureate Suu Kyi -- who was widely criticised for her defence of the same military that once locked her up for years -- said earlier Thursday that some Rohingya refugees may have "exaggerated" abuses.

"The international justice system may not yet be equipped to filter out misleading information before shadows of incrimination are cast over entire nations and governments," she wrote in an opinion piece in the Financial Times.

But Gambia hailed the decision as a major step forward by the court, which was set up after World War II to rule in disputes between UN member states.

"This is a historic day today, not just for international law, for the international community, but especially for the Rohingya," Gambian justice minister Abubacarr Tambadou told reporters outside the court.

The African state's case was was supported by the 57-nation Organisation for Islamic Cooperation, Canada and the Netherlands.

- 'First taste of justice' -

The result was also hailed in the Bangladeshi camps where some 600,000 people still remain.

"I'm having the first taste of justice. I feel positive though I doubt whether Myanmar would comply," Sayed Ullah, a Rohingya leader, told AFP.

Dildar Begum, a widow who said she was raped, two of her children killed and her village razed during the military crackdown, added: told AFP: "I thought I had to wait for Allah's judgment in the next life. But this justice gave me hope. I wish those criminals will get their punishment."

The EU and rights groups meanwhile called for the international community to put pressure on Myanmar.

"Today’s decision sends a message to Myanmar’s senior officials: the world will not tolerate their atrocities," Amnesty International’s Regional Director Nicholas Bequelin said.

The ICJ's orders are binding but it has no power to enforce them.

However the "significance... shouldn't be written off," said Cecily Rose, assistant professor in international law at Leiden University in the Netherlands, adding that the judgments "carry relatively great authority or legitimacy."

The international community has however been slow to act on the Rohingya crisis.

The UN Special Rapporteur on Myanmar Thursday slammed Russia and China, which have friendly ties with Myanmar's military, as "shameful" for blocking Security Council action on the 2017 crackdown.

"It is shameful for those states to not do anything in the face of all the evidence that we have," rapporteur Yanghee Lee told reporters at the end of a five-day visit to Bangladesh, adding that "more needs to be done" for the Rohingya.


Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting