By Lawrence Hurley WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday largely upheld the Obama administration’s authority to curb greenhouse gases from major emitters like power plants and refineries in a ruling that nonetheless exempted some smaller sources from the regulation. On a 7-2 vote, the court rejected an industry-backed argument that most emitting facilities should not be regulated for greenhouse gases under one particular air pollution program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). But industry could claim a partial win because the court ruled on a 5-4 vote that some facilities the government had wanted to regulate will be exempted. Some landfills, pulp and paper facilities, electronics manufacturing plants, chemical production plants and beverage producers are among the small industrial sources likely to be exempted, an EPA spokesman said. "It bears mention that EPA is getting almost everything it wanted in this case," Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote the majority opinion, read from a statement in court. The ruling brought an end to what started out as a broad legal challenge to the Obama administration's first suite of greenhouse gas regulations issued in 2009 and 2010. The administration won on every count except in the mixed ruling announced on Monday. The case focused only on the "prevention of serious deterioration" or PSD program, which requires any new or modified major polluting facility to obtain a permit before any new construction is done if it emits "any air pollutant." BOTH SIDES CLAIM VICTORY The EPA said in a statement: "The Supreme Court’s decision is a win for our efforts to reduce carbon pollution because it allows EPA, states and other permitting authorities to continue to require carbon pollution limits in permits for the largest pollution sources." Industry groups also claimed victory. The American Petroleum Institute said in a statement that the decision was a "stark reminder that the EPA's power is not unlimited." The justices were split in multiple ways. The four liberals voted with Scalia on one point but would have ruled for EPA on all counts. Conservative justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas would have ruled against the government across the board. Scalia was critical of the administration, saying its interpretation of the law "would bring about an enormous and transformative expansion of EPA's regulatory authority without clear congressional authorization." The parties agreed that as a result of the ruling roughly 83 percent of greenhouse gas emissions that could potentially be regulated under the EPA's interpretation of the law would still be covered, compared with the 86 percent of emissions that the EPA had hoped to regulate. Under the program, operators have to show they use the best technology available to reduce emissions of covered pollutants. More than 300 facilities have applied for permits. BROADER CHALLENGE The small-bore nature of the case was in stark contrast to the broader legal challenges initially made by industry groups and states. When the administration's first four climate change rules were issued, armies of lawyers were lined up to fight them. Some even questioned the landmark Massachusetts v EPA ruling from 2007, in which the Supreme Court said greenhouse gases were pollutants that could be regulated under the federal Clean Air Act. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the rules in a unanimous June 2012 decision. The challengers sought Supreme Court review and, in October 2013, the justices agreed to hear the narrow case that was decided on Monday. The court opted against hearing any of the broader legal challenges, leaving intact the EPA's finding that greenhouse gases should be regulated under the Clean Air Act and the agency's first regulations for cars and light trucks. Ultimately, the all-out legal assault largely fizzled. It constituted "sound and fury, signifying much less than it should have," said Eric Groten, a lawyer with the Vinson & Elkins law firm, who represented one of the challengers. The Supreme Court decision is not expected to affect the administration’s ability to set air pollution standards for greenhouse gases under a separate provision of the Clean Air Act. On June 2, the White House announced proposed rules calling for 30 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from existing power plants, including coal-fired facilities. The case is Utility Air Regulatory Group v Environmental Protection Agency et al, U.S. Supreme Court No. 12-1146 (Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Howard Goller and Grant McCool)
The former president's eldest son suggested Montana residents shoot down the balloon themselves — despite that being logistically impossible.
'Page Six' Potentially Figured Out the Identity of the "Massive Movie Star" from Jessica Simpson's Blind Item
Jessica Simpson said she almost had a fling with a massive movie star in a short story blind item published by Amazon. So, who is he? Page Six figured it out.
- Yahoo Celebrity
"I wish you could know how much I’ve hated feeling braced for news of your death," Steve-O tells his freind.
- NBC Sports BayArea
George Kittle always makes sure the vibes are in good shape on the 49ers' sideline. Even in a season-ending 31-7 loss to the Philadelphia Eagles.
The Senate minority leader previously said he had no hard feelings toward the men, but his actions said otherwise.
Actor Billy Baldwin chimed in as the Republican congressman's tweet spectacularly backfired.
- Business Insider
2 House Republicans caught saying Ilhan Omar removal was the 'stupidest vote in world' before begging reporters to not tell GOP leadership what they said
Two House Republicans blurted out what they really thought about Thursday's vote to oust Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar in what they thought was private.
- Fox Weather
Doctors are warning of a dangerous fungal illness rapidly spreading across the country, especially those living or visiting the California and Arizona areas.
- Buccaneers Wire
See what Rob Gronkowski had to say to Tom Brady following the GOAT's second retirement announcement
- Business Insider
Shooting down a suspected Chinese spy balloon could be a lot harder than it sounds, former Navy pilot says
"It's very difficult with what we have, because what we have was not meant to shoot down balloons," a former naval aviator told Insider.
- The New Voice of Ukraine
Russian dictator Vladimir Putin has begun to invent a new type of military because his entire army has nearly been liquidated by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Ivan Kyrychevsky, an expert writing for the Ukrainian Defense Express military news outlet, said in an interview with Radio NV on Feb. 3.
There's a Bombshell New Audio Clip That Shows the Trump Team Strategizing Exactly How They're Going to Push Election Fraud Lies
Donald Trump’s campaign team in Wisconsin knew they lost the state in the 2020 presidential election, but that didn’t stop them from trying to spin a fraud narrative. There’s new audio that is confirming that Republican officials behind the scenes were trying to cook up a story that the election was stolen. This is the […]
The debate might've been even weirder than we thought.
- Good Housekeeping
During a recent taping of 'Today With Hoda and Jenna,' NBC journalist Hoda Kotb called out Jenna Bush Hager for misunderstanding the topic discussed on the air.
A scene from 'Gossip Girl' has gone viral on TikTok as viewers notice Blake Lively wore pulled-down sweatpants under a skin-tight mini-dress
A TikToker noticed that Blake Lively was wearing almost impossibly low-slung sweatpants beneath a body-con mini-dress.
(Bloomberg) -- Former President Donald Trump is getting ready to write a check to a Florida court for more than $1 million — but he’s hoping to get the money back.Most Read from BloombergWhat You Need to Know About the Suspected Chinese Spy Balloon Floating Over the USUS Postpones Blinken China Visit in Uproar Over Alleged Spy BalloonAdani’s $108 Billion Crisis Shakes Investors’ Faith in IndiaMerck Covid Drug Linked to New Virus Mutations, Study SaysUS Weighs Calling Off Blinken Visit to China O
Trump says that if he's reelected he won't use the powers of the presidency to punish his enemies, but adds that he'd be 'entitled to a revenge tour'
In an interview with Hugh Hewitt, Trump went on a tirade against news outlets that reported on Russian interference during the 2016 election.
I Feel Like I Wasn't Supposed To See These 25 Photos, But I'm Gonna Show 'Em To You Juuuust In Case They Mysteriously Disappear
I'm gonna be checking the bubbles in my drink for a secret message for the rest of my life, TBH.
- USA TODAY Sports - Golfweek
‘Just a Hall of Fame player that didn’t create controversy’: For Jordan Spieth, one LIV member is missed more than others
"He was a friend of mine. He is a friend of mine. I just haven't seen him. But I always really enjoyed playing with him and being around him."
- Ukrayinska Pravda
Successful ambush behind enemy lines: Armed Forces of Ukraine destroy modernised tank and capture Russian marines
In the area of Vuhledar, Donetsk Oblast, soldiers of the Special Operations Forces (SOF) of Ukraine and the 72nd Separate Mechanised Brigade have destroyed Russian equipment and captured two Russian servicemen.