Uber and Lyft just lost their bid to delay a court order in California that says their drivers must be classified as employees

uber lyft protest drivers LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - APRIL 16: A protestor displays a sign as Uber and Lyft drivers with Rideshare Drivers United and the
 Transport Workers Union of America prepare to conduct a ‘caravan protest’ outside the California Labor Commissioner’s office amidst the coronavirus pandemic on April 16, 2020 in Los Angeles, California. The drivers called for California to enforce the AB 5 law so that they may qualify for unemployment insurance as the spread of COVID-19 continues. Drivers also called for receiving back wages they say they are owed. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Drivers in California sued Uber and Lyft, alleging the companies owe them $630 million in back wages.

A California judge on Thursday refused to grant Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. more time to appeal his decision requiring the ride-hailing companies to classify drivers in that state as employees.

At a hearing in San Francisco County Superior Court, Judge Ethan Schulman said he found no reason to push back his August 20 deadline for the companies to appeal the preliminary injunction he issued on Monday before it could take effect.

"I am unconvinced that any extension of the 10-day stay is required," Schulman said. "Both applications are denied."

Uber and Lyft have said they will appeal.

Uber shares were down 0.9% in afternoon trading, while Lyft shares lost 4.8%. Lyft reported its second-quarter earnings results late on Wednesday.

The injunction came as part of a lawsuit in which California and the cities of Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Francisco accused Uber and Lyft of violating Assembly Bill 5, a new state law making it harder to treat "gig" workers as independent contractors.

Uber and Lyft prefer using that classification for drivers because treating them as employees would require benefits such as minimum wage, paid sick and family leave, unemployment insurance, and workers' compensation insurance.

"Lyft cannot comply with the injunction at the flip of a switch," Lyft President John Zimmer said on a conference call Thursday. "Reclassifying tens of thousands of self-employed drivers would be a significant challenge in normal times. And in the current pandemic environment, that would be nearly impossible."

The hearing came one day after the companies threatened to temporarily stop serving California, saying that treating drivers as employees would require overhauling their business models.

Neither company is profitable, and both have suffered steep ridership declines during the coronavirus pandemic. They have also said drivers prefer remaining independent.

Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, Instacart, and Postmates are spending more than $110 million to support Proposition 22, a November ballot measure in California to keep drivers as contractors, but with some benefits.

In ordering an injunction, Schulman had assailed what he called Uber's and Lyft's "prolonged and brazen refusal" to comply with state law.

Read the original article on Business Insider