A weekend stimulus deal just got more likely after Republicans and Democrats resolved their clash over the Federal Reserve

·5 min read
chuck schumer
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on February 5, 2020 in Washington, DC. Samuel Corum/Getty Images
  • A GOP measure to limit the Federal Reserve's lending powers imperiled the odds of a weekend stimulus deal on Saturday.

  • But a deal just got more likely after lawmakers struck a compromise, clearing the way for a possible Sunday vote on a $900 billion rescue package on Sunday.

  • Republican and Democrats fought bitterly over the Fed's emergency aid programs, which have assisted state and local governments as well as mid-sized businesses.

  • Democrats argued the Republican proposal could cripple the incoming Biden administration's ability to respond to the current economic crisis.

  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

A late Republican push to curtail the Federal Reserve's lending authority had threatened to derail a weekend stimulus deal. But a broad agreement just got more likely after lawmakers struck a compromise on Fed lending, clearing the way for a possible Sunday vote on a $900 billion rescue package.

The clash over the Fed between Republicans and Democrats had intensified on Capitol Hill earlier on Saturday. Politico reported that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told senators in a caucus call that Republicans should stand firm with Sen. Patrick Toomey.

He sought to cut off the central bank's emergency lending powers after they sunset on Dec. 31, the current expiration date under the CARES Act which Congress approved in March.

As the pandemic swept the US and devastated the economy earlier this year, the central bank set up an array of programs to aid the flow of credit and provide loans to mid-sized businesses, along with state and local governments. The proposal would restrain the Fed's ability to restart those programs without congressional approval. Toomey, the incoming chair of the Senate Banking Committee, called it "a bright red line" this week.

The ensuing fight had imperiled the odds of a relief package passing both chambers of Congress this weekend. But Toomey later reached an agreement with Democratic Congressional leaders which would prevent similar emergency lending programs to be replicated without Congress signing off on it.

"This agreement will preserve Fed independence and prevent Democrats from hijacking these programs for political and social policy purposes," Steve Kelly, a spokesperson for Toomey, said in a statement to Business Insider.

The $900 billion federal assistance package is expected to include $600 stimulus checks for many Americans, $300 federal unemployment benefits, vaccine distribution funds, as well as another round of small business aid.

The GOP measure sought to rein in the Fed, but the agreement makes final passage more likely

Lawmakers authorized a two-day funding extension late on Friday to settle longstanding policy differences. But the brawl over the Fed had threatened to push talks into next week.

Republicans said that keeping the Fed's emergency lending programs in place could cause the institution to overstep its historic boundaries as a lender of last resort. They also argued the Fed initiatives could create an avenue to aid states and municipalities, long a Democratic priority.

Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana, a GOP member of the Senate Banking Committee, told reporters on Saturday that maintaining those programs could turn the Fed into "a commercial bank" and said "we're gonna stand firm."

Democrats fiercely resisted the measure. They argued it's a political move aimed at crippling President-elect Joe Biden's ability to manage the recovery while simultaneously jeopardizing the Fed's capacity to respond to future recessions as well.

"The last thing America needs right now is to make it tougher to help people in communities and that's what this proposal does," Sen. Ron Wyden, ranking Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, said in a brief interview on Capitol Hill. He added it was "a significant sticking point" in the volatile negotiations.

"There's no reason the Treasury and the Fed in the Biden Administration should have fewer tools to address an economic crisis than the Trump Administration had," Bharat Ramamurti, a Democratic panelist on the Congressional Oversight Commission policing the Treasury and Fed's economic response, tweeted on Saturday.

Not every Republican appeared to be onboard with Toomey's proposal. Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah told Business Insider in a brief interview that pursuing major Fed reforms could wait until next year.

"I think the Fed should be returned to the powers it had prior to the CARES Act, but I think other reforms should wait for another time," Romney said.

Senators discussed the divide during a confirmation vote on the Senate floor on Saturday afternoon, and a group that included Toomey and Romney broke off and met in Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's office. After leaving, Toomey said, "I think that we should be able to get a deal done."

The fight on Capitol Hill elicited a rare public statement from Ben Bernanke, who served as chair of the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. He said the central bank's emergency lending powers from before the pandemic should remain "fully intact," adding it was "vital" for its ability to respond to future financial or economic crises.

Now Congress is on course for a rapid-fire series of votes on Sunday. It sets up a very narrow margin of error for lawmakers, given that they are also attempting to pass a $1.4 trillion spending package to fund federal agencies into next year.

Congressional leaders are aiming to combine both, and they could have only hours to review broad spending legislation that surpasses $2 trillion.

A failure from Congress to pass a new relief package carries potentially calamitous consequences for many Americans. Unemployment claims have risen for the past three weeks, and nearly 13 million people are threatened with the loss of all their unemployment assistance if some federal measures are not renewed by year's end.

An eviction on moratoriums also expires on December 31, which would put millions of Americans at risk of losing their homes.

Read the original article on Business Insider