We've Underestimated Our Ability to Spot Alien Signals From Exoplanets
Artistic depiction of various exoplanets.
An encouraging new study has found that the interference from exoplanets—planets that orbit stars outside our solar system—has been overestimated in searches for extraterrestrial signals.
The results from the study, released last week in The Astronomical Journal, mean that scientists can concentrate on finer frequency shifts, markedly improving the potential effectiveness of campaigns to sniff out alien technosignatures, namely radio signals.
Read more
Peter Parker Can’t Do The ‘Wakanda Forever’ Salute In Spider-Man 2
Dancing With The Stars casting Sean Spicer is a big part of why Tom Bergeron left
5 Disappointing Things About Konami’s Metal Gear Solid 'Master Collection'
Turo Wants Customer To Pay $35,000 After Vandals Smash His Rented Car’s Windows
“This work gives deeper insight into what extraterrestrially transmitted signals may look like if they come from exoplanets, informing not only the parameter space of technosignature searches but also possible interpretations of detected signals,” said Li in a SETI Institute press release.
Scientists must consider how exoplanets move relative to Earth while searching for alien signals; this helps them to pinpoint potential sources and determine if detected signals are genuine or just from celestial movements. Now, when scientists try to capture signals from distant exoplanets, the Doppler effect comes into play. And yes, this is the same phenomenon that causes the pitch of an ambulance siren to change as it zooms past.
In the case of SETI astronomy, the Doppler effect results in a shift in the frequency of signals due to the relative movement between the transmitting exoplanet and Earth. This variation in frequency, termed the “drift rate,” is influenced by both the Earth’s and the exoplanet’s orbits and rotations. A lower drift rate indicates a more stable signal, which is essential for distinguishing potential alien transmissions from natural interferences.
Previously, based on the research of Sofia Sheikh from the SETI Institute, it was believed that, in the most extreme cases, exoplanetary systems exhibited drift rates of up to 200 nHz, prompting Sheikh to propose this value as a threshold (thresholds help scientists prioritize signals that are more likely to be stable and potentially of interest). However, the new research, which took data from over 5,300 known exoplanets from the NASA Exoplanet Archive, found a surprising revelation. In 99% of cases, the drift rate caused by these exoplanets was only 53 nHz. Furthermore, for stars without any known orbiting planets, the drift rate plummeted to a mere 0.44 nHz.
In essence, these findings suggest that the previous threshold of 200 nHz may have significantly underestimated the potential stability of signals originating from extraterrestrial civilizations, potentially making it easier for us to detect deliberate transmissions from aliens; the lower drift rate threshold allows SETI researchers to focus on more stable signals, which are easier and faster to analyze. And as Sheikh explained in the press release: “These results imply that, in many cases, the drift rate will be so low that we can prioritize other parameters (such as covering more frequencies or analyzing datasets faster) without worrying that we will miss true signals.”
The newly established limits, which include the majority of drift rates generated by stable radio signals from exoplanets, are poised to significantly reduce the time and computing expenses required for future searches, including the one planned by Breakthrough Listen using the MeerKAT telescope. This means that these searches could become almost a thousand times faster and more cost-effective, according to the paper.
This is amazing news for future SETI campaigns. The added precision should allow for a more efficient use of resources, akin to searching a specific corner of a haystack for a needle rather than having to scour the entire stack.
For more spaceflight in your life, follow us on X (formerly Twitter) and bookmark Gizmodo’s dedicated Spaceflight page.
More from Gizmodo
Paramount delays the next Mission: Impossible, which is no longer called Dead Reckoning: Part Two
Dealership Charges Extra If You Pay In Cash And People Are Pissed
Sign up for Gizmodo's Newsletter. For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
