Why Henry Cavill is leaving The Witcher after season 3
- Oops!Something went wrong.Please try again later.
The Witcher spoilers follow, but they're minor.
Ever since Henry Cavill was first cast as Geralt of Rivia, he's talked time and time again of his love for all things Witcher.
"I really enjoy playing these kind of games and reading these kinds of books in my spare time," he said as far back as 2019 (via Hobby Consolas). "I don't consider it a job," Cavill continued. "For me it is more like an extraordinary opportunity to live my childhood and adult life fantasies."
And that's why it's come as such a shock that Henry will no longer be involved with the show beyond season three.
It's time to stop tossing those coins to Cavill, because on October 29, 2022, Netflix revealed that Geralt has been recast for season four with Liam Hemsworth (The Hunger Games) now set to star as the titular White Wolf.
In an official statement following this big reveal, our new Geralt said he's "over the moon" about the opportunity to play him. That's lovely, but a lot of fans have already made it clear they're not happy with this change.
As Liam himself said, he has "some big boots to fill", and for most viewers, it's impossible right now to imagine anyone other than Cavill in the role.
Regardless of what you think of the show, one thing The Witcher fans all seemed to agree on is that Henry is the Witcher, perfectly embodying the Geralt of their dreams from the books and games alike.
So what gives? Well, in a statement of his own, Cavill was typically gracious about leaving the show and wished Liam all the best as his replacement.
"In my stead, the fantastic Mr Liam Hemsworth will be taking up the mantle of the White Wolf. As with the greatest of literary characters, I pass the torch with reverence for the time spent embodying Geralt and enthusiasm to see Liam's take on this most fascinating and nuanced of men. Liam, good sir, this character has such a wonderful depth to him, enjoy diving in and seeing what you can find."
That's all well and good, but why exactly did Henry decide to break our hearts leave The Witcher in the first place? No official reason has been given just yet, but we have our suspicions...
Did Henry Cavill leave The Witcher because of Superman?
According to Deadline, where the news first broke, sources claim that Cavill had only made a "short-term deal" for The Witcher. After three seasons, it was simply time to move on. And that's thanks in large part to a hefty production schedule where he needed to juggle lots of other big projects. Those same sources also suggest that Henry's Witcher co-stars also renegotiated their contracts heading into season four as well.
Upon hearing the news, most fans immediately figured that Henry Cavill's exit from The Witcher might have something to do with his other signature role. Yep, you know the one.
And to be fair, the timing of this announcement was curious. During the same week as this reveal, Henry returned as Superman in the mid-credits scene for Black Adam. It wasn't a long cameo in terms of screentime, but its impact can't be overstated.
This has been a long time coming for fans and Cavill alike. For many, he is the perfect Superman, and Henry's certainly established himself as a fan-favourite in the role, despite DC's wider universe-building issues.
While major change is in the waters over at Warner Bros now that Worlds of DC has new management, and Superman's return could very well be a part of that. However, despite Dwayne Johnson confessing that he'd "fought for years" to bring Cavill back, things have shaped up rather differently where Cavill’s involvement is concerned.
In December 2022, James Gunn dropped the bomb that Cavill would not be returning to the role of Superman.
In the midst of a tweet teasing the new direction for DC, Gunn announced Cavill's departure stating:
"In the initial stages, our story will be focusing on an earlier part of Superman's life, so the character will not be played by Henry Cavill.
"But we just had a great meeting with Henry and we’re big fans and we talked about a number of exciting possibilities to work together in the future."
Cavill followed up with his own statement on Instagram which read:
"I have just had a meeting with James Gunn and Peter Safran and it's sad news, everyone. I will, after all, not be returning as Superman."
"After being told by the studio to announce my return back in October, prior to their hire, this news isn't the easiest, but that's life. I respect that James and Peter have a universe to build. I wish them and all involved with the new universe the best of luck, and the happiest of fortunes."
This was no doubt a huge blow for Cavill who had long made it clear that he was extremely keen to reprise the role of Superman again, and with a renewed focus on the character's "bright future" this could have certainly played a role in his exit from The Witcher.
Henry even shot his cameo midway through filming for The Witcher season three, and he was unable to explain why he needed to leave set due to DC's need for secrecy.
Could that have caused friction on set? Perhaps, but Cavill has proved time and time again that he's devoted to the role of Geralt as well, so it seems unlikely he would have just left without trying to juggle both of these roles still. Not unless there's another reason why he left. We really hope so given that his career at DC has now come to an end.
Did Henry Cavill leave because of problems with The Witcher?
The news of Henry's exit was particularly surprising for fans who remember him once saying (via The Hollywood Reporter) that he was prepared to stay on board for seven whole seasons. However, there was a caveat to all this.
Cavill was happy to continue playing Geralt "as long as we can keep telling great stories which honour [author Andrzej] Sapkowski's work". It's a point actors often make, but given Henry's dedication to the role, it's one we're inclined to believe more than usual here.
"I'm a huge fan of the books and staying loyal to them," reiterated Cavill on The Witcher's YouTube channel. "It's about making sure that story happens without too much in the way of diversions or side things going on to muddy the waters."
But did the waters start to get a bit too muddy? Geralt is often covered in grime, and he does love a cheeky bath, after all...
Henry himself has actively fought to keep Netflix's The Witcher faithful to the books. While promoting season two, Cavill told Total Film: "This season, I really wanted to make sure that we represented the book's Geralt more accurately, and that we saw him speak more. I pushed really, really hard for that."
That's really commendable and also reassuring for fans to hear, but on the flip side of that, why did Henry have to push "really, really hard" for this kind of accuracy in the first place?
During our own exclusive chat for Digital Spy, Cavill told us "it was such a shame" that "a lovely bit" from 'Blood of Elves' had been left out of season two, so he took a key quote from that story and improvised it in Roach's death scene instead.
Not only does this serve as a strong reminder of Henry's reverence for the material, but it also reminds us yet again that his vision for the show wasn't exactly aligned with what ended up on screen.
That in of itself is not necessarily a bad thing. Writers and actors aren't always going to agree, and sometimes, the writers room might have a wider vision that even someone as involved as Cavill might not be privy to at first.
However, new quotes from writer Beau DeMayo suggest that some of The Witcher team might not respect the source material in the same way that Henry so obviously does.
During a recent Instagram Q&A session (shared via The Direct), ex-The Witcher writer DeMayo claimed the following:
"I've been on a show – namely Witcher – where some of the writers were not or actively disliked the books and games (even actively mocking the source material). It's a recipe for disaster and bad morale. Fandom as a litmus test checks egos, and makes all the long nights worth it. You have to respect the work before you're allowed to add to its legacy."
DeMayo, who also worked as a co-producer on two episodes of The Witcher's first season, doesn't mention anyone specifically here, and for all we know, the people he's thinking of might not even be working on the show any more.
However, when you also factor in the multiple changes this show has already made to Sapkowski's books — think the season two ending, for example — it's likely that Cavill wasn't happy with Geralt's direction overall, regardless of whether DeMayo's claims are true or not.
Showrunner Lauren Schmidt Hissrich has previously discussed the importance of the books and how they underpin this show, telling IGN: "We're all big fans of the books. We're all big fans of the video games as well, but this is solely based on the books and that's really where we drew our inspiration from – starting with the short stories."
But not all the fans would agree considering the many changes afoot, and given Cavill's own super-fan status, it's entirely possible that he might number among them. And if Henry wasn't happy, there's still only so much he could change and alter within the role.
Of course, this could all be way off base. Remember, none of these theories have been confirmed just yet, and for all we know, there might be a completely different reason why Henry Cavill's hanging up that wig for good. Maybe it's itchy? Maybe he doesn't like the colour? Or maybe he's just tired of juggling so many intense action roles all at once, to which we say fair play.
But whatever happens, it's hard to imagine The Witcher going on for long without Henry. No matter how good or bad Liam Hemsworth turns out to be in the role, it's one that seems impossible to envision right now without Cavill and that loveable, musty old wig.
The Witcher seasons 1-2 are now streaming on Netflix. Season 3 is in production, and spin-off The Witcher: Blood Origin premieres on December 25, also on Netflix.
You Might Also Like
