Why do more Democrats than Republicans trust The Daily Caller and the National Review?
It's little secret that news media polarization in the United States is at a fever pitch, as outlets like Fox News, MSNBC, CNN, and others position themselves along disparate sides of the yawning partisan gap that has increasingly come to define American politics. While study after study has shown wavering levels of public trust in the media as a whole, a just-released poll puts a new wrinkle in the sentiment that partisanship is a perfect indicator of which outlet engenders the most trust from its audience. In fact, as respondents to the latest YouGov Trust in Media survey indicated, conservative skepticism of the news at large is so pervasive that even some of the most unambiguously right-wing outlets are considered more trustworthy by self-identified Democrats than the ostensibly Republican audience to which they blatantly cater.
What does the study show?
Conducted between April 3 - 9, YouGov's Trust in Media 2023 poll surveyed 1,500 U.S. citizens, asking them "whether they trust, distrust, or neither trust nor distrust" 56 different outlets across broadcast, digital, and print media. Out of those outlets, the clear winner in terms of bipartisan trustworthiness was The Weather Channel, "the only outlet that YouGov asked about that more Democrats (+64) and Republicans (+47) trust than the shares who distrust it." Outside of the Weather Channel, Fox News was the only other outlet that was deemed trustworthy by a majority of GOP respondents. Given the degree to which Fox has positioned itself — and been positioned in turn by various politicians and notable public figures — as the epicenter of the conservative news universe, broad Republican trust in the network is not much of a surprise.
More surprising, however, was the inverse of this trend when it comes to a number of smaller, more staunchly right-wing outlets, such as the Tucker Carlson-founded Daily Caller, the conservative-leaning Washington Examiner, and even the so-called "bible of American Conservatism," The National Review. Counterintuitively, more Democrats than Republican respondents said that those right-wing publications were trustworthy.
Despite none of the above three outlets scoring comparatively high in terms of overall trustworthiness, the unexpected support from Democrats was notable enough to draw the attention of several high-profile commentators and pundits, many of whom pointed to a fundamental truth underlying the survey's findings.
'Republicans just do not trust reported news at all'
This pattern emerged after "decades of conservative media relentlessly exacerbating the natural distrust of the [mainstream media] with their audience to ensure that people tuned in," author and academic Brian Rosenwald suggested to Semafor editor-in-chief Ben Smith, who noted the Democratic tendency to be more trustworthy on Twitter.
Allowing for the "exception of a few avowedly right-wing name brands (which aren't really news)," reporter Chase Woodruff said in a similar conclusion, in general, "the bigger and more widely known a news outlet is, the less Republicans trust it."
"Republicans," he continued, "just do not trust reported news at all," with CNN and MSNBC holding similar levels of distrust among Republicans because "they have roughly the same name recognition."
For MSNBC's Zeeshan Aleem, the survey's results are animated in no small part not simply by Republican self-identification, but by a particular strain of conservatism stemming from — and centered around — former President Donald Trump.
"[Republicans] don't even have trust in a number of famous right-wing outlets, perhaps in part because publications like National Review and the New York Post have been critical of former President Donald Trump, or perhaps because today's Republicans are generally suspicious of old guard, 'establishment' right-wing journalism," Aleem wrote in an opinion essay. "It appears that Republicans seem to only trust overtly propagandistic right-wing outlets that follow not only the party line, but specifically Trumpism," he concluded.
Conversely, Politico's Jack Shafer urged a measure of caution when parsing the poll, highlighting a lack of explanatory data in just how respondents engaged with each outlet, to the point where "allowing respondents to judge the trustworthiness of outlets without determining how often they consume them is like asking a kid to rate the flavors from the Baskin-Robbins library he's never tasted." Still, Shafer similarly noted the self-sabotaging effort by conservative outlets who encourage their audiences to mistrust any source of information beyond the one they're watching at that moment, asserting that "outside of the established TV brands of Fox News, Newsmax and OAN, Republicans refuse to automatically bestow trust on any media, even outlets that appeal to their prejudices."
Ultimately, no matter how seemingly contradictory and disheartening the YouGov poll results may be, many media scholars have stressed that some degree of measured skepticism when consuming news can, as the Knight Foundation wrote in its overview of media trust in 2022, be "beneficial in today's media environment."
University of Maine Communications and Journalism Professor Michael J. Socolow seemingly agrees, writing in an essay on media trust last month that "media criticism comprises an essential component of media literacy."
"And," he added, "a vibrant democracy."
For Shafer, who cited Socolow's work, that skepticism can indeed be important in parsing the increasingly fractious array of news sources available today. But, he cautioned, other "expressions of 'distrust' in media polls are just another way for people to say the contemporary subject matter in the news makes them uncomfortable."
You may also like
DeSantis bans Chinese citizens from buying land in Florida
Researchers discover submerged cemetery and hospital off the Florida coast
Norway's near-total adoption of electric vehicles appears to be going smoothly, defying skeptics
